Home / Quotes / Quote by John Landgraf

Quote by John Landgraf

“Not ever having been an agent myself, my sense is that upper-level agents who have the most power, who can move people through the system more easily, are less willing to take on the volume of work to break somebody new. And then lower-level people, if they are willing to take on somebody new, they don't necessarily have as much sway, and it's harder for them to push somebody through.”

Quote by John Landgraf

Author

John Landgraf, born on May 20, 1962, is an accomplished television producer with extensive experience in the industry. He has made a significant impact as an executive producer on several popular television series. more

You May Also Like

“American couples have gone to such lengths to avoid the interference of in-laws that they have to pay marriage counselors to interfere between them.”

Law Literature Pay Gone Couple Length Interfere In-laws Interference Counselor

Book:Reflections In A Jaundiced Eye

Source: Reflections In A Jaundiced Eye

“Deanell Tacha and I decided to write an editorial, because both of us have had experiences in countries where the rule of law is not strong. Uh, where there is civil war. Where there is disorder. And, it, it seemed to us important to underscore that this is a treasure, our rule of law, our judiciary independent from politics, and it's in jeopardy.”

Writing Important War Country Strong Independent Civil War Rule Of Law Judiciary

Author:Martha Minow

“I understand the politics of the situation, I think that many Republican members of the senate believe that,get out the vote move. They can indicate that they're strong for their base. But the Constitution's pretty clear. The president Donald Trump has to nominate someone. The senate can choose to disapprove. There's nothing in their Constitution that says the grounds upon which they must vote. But to refuse even to meet with the individual, or to have the process go forward, that's just pure politics.”

Thinking Believe Moving Individual Strong President Situation Republican Vote Constitution

Author:Martha Minow

“I have to be honest and say members of both political parties have contributed to de-legitimization of the process. Even President Barack Obama when he was a senator, contributed to it, in the sense of voting against a well-qualified individual because he disagreed with the view. Again, that's the prerogative of the senators. They're allowed to express their views on any basis.”

Political Individual President Party Honest Barack Being Honest Voting Political Parties President Barack Obama

Author:Martha Minow

“That's a really sad moment. When people in a democracy are afraid of having the conversation, because it might actually lead to a conclusion they don't like, as opposed to saying, let's have the conversation, and let's learn, and, you know, let's, let me try to persuade you, and if I'm not persuading you, then you try to persuade me. That's what we hope for.”

People Trying Moments Democracy Let Me Conclusion Persuading Really Sad

Author:Martha Minow

“The United States Constitution builds politics right into the process of selecting federal judges. This third branch, the judiciary, is designed to have a longer view. To have individuals who are more insulated from politics. They're not elected directly. They're appointed for life. So, politics enters, but it's also, controlled. And if you bypass this process, I'm not sure what we do.”

Individual Judging Constitution Not Sure Judiciary

Author:Martha Minow

“Of course, in the states, about half the states elect their judges, and that's an even more direct involvement with politics. But I think it's not the same as the elections of many other candidates. People who run for the judiciary, I think are pretty careful to indicate that they will adhere to the rule of law.”

People Thinking Running Judging Direct Election Careful Involvement Rule Of Law Judiciary

Author:Martha Minow

“In the era of modern technology, people could just vote on their phones for who they want to be judges. We could amend all of the ways in which we select our leaders, with the advent of modern technology. We haven't done so. It's actually served us fairly well. Ours is the longest enduring constitutional, written constitution in the world. At the moment, I think it's strained. It's showing the strains of politics and a frustration.”

People Thinking World Done Moments Leader Technology Modern Judging Vote Constitution Endure Frustration Select Advent Modern Technology

Author:Martha Minow

“I think frustration unfortunately, reflects a real breakdown in the political parties themselves, which is fascinating because our constitution did not anticipate political parties. They're not even written in the Constitution, there's no guidelines. When we look at the arcane processes of delegate selection in the primaries and caucuses, it's not in the Constitution. This is all created post Constitution. And yet I think we're in the middle of tensions between and within the political parties. They're not functioning that well.”

Thinking Real Political Party Constitution Tension Frustration Political Parties Breakdown

Author:Martha Minow

“Let's put it in perspective at the United States Supreme Court, which hears maybe 60 cases a year, most of the cases are resolved without much dispute. The 10 or 15 that are controversial we all know about, and we hear about. The federal courts hear just a tiny sliver of the cases that go to court in this country. Most of the cases are in the state courts. And most legal issues never go to court. So, the legal system is actually not in jeopardy. At the same time, access to law is in jeopardy.”

Country Perspective Supreme Court Controversial

Author:Martha Minow