“The Court’s insistence that judges and lawyers rely nearly exclusively on history to interpret the Second Amendment thus raises a host of troubling questions. Consider, for example, the following. Do lower courts have the research resources necessary to conduct exhaustive historical analyses in every Second Amendment case? What historical regulations and decisions qualify as representative analogues to modern laws? How will judges determine which historians have the better view of close historical questions? Will the meaning of the Second Amendment change if or when new historical evidence becomes available? And, most importantly, will the Court’s approach permit judges to reach the outcomes they prefer and then cloak those outcomes in the language of history?”
Quote by Stephen G. Breyer
Work
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen
Browse quotes and source details for this work. more
Author
You May Also Like
Source: How Change Happens: A Theory of Philosophy of History, Social Change and Cultural Evolution
Source: Eumeswil
Source: Transition Point: From Steam to the Singularity
Source: Transition Point: From Steam to the Singularity
Source: Transition Point: From Steam to the Singularity
Source: Overcoming Mediocrity: Limitless Women
Source: Transition Point: From Steam to the Singularity