Quotessence
Home / Quotes / Quote by Taradas Bandyopadhyay

Quote by Taradas Bandyopadhyay

“আমি খুব সাধারণ রক্তমাংসের মানুষ। সাধনা করে কিছু শক্তি পেয়েছিলাম, এইমাত্র। কিন্তু অমরজীবনের প্রকৃত পরিচয় আমিও জানি না। না জানাই বোধহয় ভালো। আমরা বুঝতে পারবো না, কেবলমাত্র বিভ্রান্ত হবো। যদি পরজন্ম বলে কিছু থাকে, তবে হয়তো আবার তার সঙ্গে দেখা হবে।”

Quote by Taradas Bandyopadhyay

Book:তারানাথ তান্ত্রিক সমগ্র
Create image

Work

তারানাথ তান্ত্রিক সমগ্র

Browse quotes and source details for this work. more

Author

Taradas Bandyopadhyay

Browse famous quotes and profile details for Taradas Bandyopadhyay. more

You May Also Like

“How to Tell A Human (Naskar Test) How to tell a human from ape, when both look the same? Look for the creature that considers everyone outside their religion a heathen, and everyone outside their culture a heretic - that's a textbook ape. Now look for the being that finds the same human spirit in every culture, religion and nation - that right there, is a rare human specimen. How to tell a human from robot, when both look the same? Look for the contraption that considers everything outside logic, without value - that's a lifeless robot. Look for the soul that knows when to, and when not to, apply logic in life and society - that's a living human.”

HumanityDiversityHumanToleranceExistentialismHumanistIntoleranceFundamentalismIntegrationInclusive
Book:Iftar-e Insaniyat: The First Supper
Create image

“What’s true of counterfeiting money should also be true of counterfeiting humans. If governments took decisive action to protect trust in money, it makes sense to take equally decisive measures to protect trust in humans. Prior to the rise of AI, one human could pretend to be another, and society punished such frauds. But society didn’t bother to outlaw the creation of counterfeit humans, since the technology to do so didn’t exist. Now that AI can pass itself off as human, it threatens to destroy trust between humans and to unravel the fabric of society. Dennett suggests, therefore, that governments should outlaw fake humans as decisively as they have previously outlawed fake money.[54] The law should prohibit not just deepfaking specific real people—creating a fake video of the U.S. president, for example—but also any attempt by a nonhuman agent to pass itself off as a human. If anyone complains that such strict measures violate freedom of speech, they should be reminded that bots don’t have freedom of speech. Banning human beings from a public platform is a sensitive step, and democracies should be very careful about such censorship. However, banning bots is a simple issue: it doesn’t violate anyone’s rights, because bots don’t have rights.[55] None of this means that democracies must ban all bots, algorithms, and AIs from participating in any discussion. Digital agents are welcome to join many conversations, provided they don’t pretend to be humans. For example, AI doctors can be extremely helpful. They can monitor our health twenty-four hours a day, offer medical advice tailored to our individual medical conditions and personality, and answer our questions with infinite patience. But the AI doctor should never try to pass itself off as a human.”

PersonalityHumanAiComputersCounterfeitAlgorithmsImpersonationDeep Fakes
Book:Nexus: A Brief History of Information Networks from the Stone Age to AI
Create image

“It is important to address the (mis)perception that systems research is non-humanistic. To offer a short response, it is vital to remember that our civilization — a society where people live in towns or cities, communicate by writing, and build monumental structures , is a system connected by our relationships. The subject of systems cannot be more human.”

CivilizationHumanSystems ThinkingSystems
Book:5 Ideas from Global Diplomacy: System-wide Transformation Methods to Close the Compliance Gap and Advance the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals
Create image