“At some point enough voters decided that government was less a thing to be frightened of than it was a tool with which they could accomplish all manner of good. In short, people decided that they wanted a good deal more in terms of positive rights than the minimal version they had previously experienced. In exchange, the negative rights they had possessed to that point had to give way to some degree in favor of the positive rights they sought. This necessarily meant that some of the potential for cooperation among them had to give way to a greater level of coercion.”
Quote by Antony Davies
Work
Cooperation and Coercion: How Busybodies Became Busybullies and What that Means for Economics and Politics
Browse quotes and source details for this work. more
Author
You May Also Like
Source: Cooperation and Coercion: How Busybodies Became Busybullies and What that Means for Economics and Politics
Source: Cooperation and Coercion: How Busybodies Became Busybullies and What that Means for Economics and Politics
Source: Cooperation and Coercion: How Busybodies Became Busybullies and What that Means for Economics and Politics
Source: Cooperation and Coercion: How Busybodies Became Busybullies and What that Means for Economics and Politics
“For what blessing may a man hope for but An immortality in The loving vigilance of death.”
Source: Cooperation and Coercion: How Busybodies Became Busybullies and What that Means for Economics and Politics
Source: Cooperation and Coercion: How Busybodies Became Busybullies and What that Means for Economics and Politics
Source: Cooperation and Coercion: How Busybodies Became Busybullies and What that Means for Economics and Politics
Source: Cooperation and Coercion: How Busybodies Became Busybullies and What that Means for Economics and Politics
Source: Cooperation and Coercion: How Busybodies Became Busybullies and What that Means for Economics and Politics