Quotessence
Home / Quotes / Quote by Craig Hamilton-Parker

Quote by Craig Hamilton-Parker

“[When testing psychic abilities of normal people who claimed no psychic powers, J.B Rhine found that] success rate deteriorates if you undertake prolonged experimentation. As with telepathy, clairvoyance and precognition experiments, J.B Rhine observed that this decline effect reflected the subject's loss of interest. [...] And as with other ESP experiments, the degree of belief in your powers can prove significant. Rhine found that sceptics again scored below what you would expect from chance alone.”

Quote by Craig Hamilton-Parker

Work

Your Psychic Powers: A Beginner's Guide

Browse quotes and source details for this work. more

Author

Craig Hamilton-Parker

Browse famous quotes and profile details for Craig Hamilton-Parker. more

You May Also Like

“I sometimes tell my students to do a writing exercise that’s just something on their desk. An object they’ve had with them for a while, a photograph, a stone from the ocean, a shell. I tell them just to explore it, interrogate it, just turn it over in your head and see what might happen. And the most amazing thing happens: they really find they love those objects, and can write about them for a long time. That they carried that black stone home from a day with their father just weeks before he died, that the small elephant was a gift from a friend on a day of heartbreak. We start talking about those objects and soon it feels like our whole life is full of small stories to be grateful for. So many small things we pass all the time without holding them up to the light.”

“Неопределенность, бесплановая природа времени пугает, однако благодаря мышлению в понятиях прекарности делается очевидным: неопределенность-то и делает жизнь возможной. Единственная причина, почему все это звучит странно, - в том, что большинство из нас выросло в грезах о модернизации и прогрессе. Эти рамки выделяют те черты настоящего, которые могут вести к будущему. [...] Понятие прогресса, относящееся к положению вещей в целом, ныне встречается редко, и даже модернизация ХХ века уже воспринимается как архаика. Но их категории - всегда с нами. Мы ежедневно представляем себе образы прогресса: демократия, рост, наука, перспективы. С чего нам ожидать, что экономика будет расти, а науки - развиваться? [...] Тем не менее современная человеческая спесь - не единственный план создания миров: мы окружены множеством творящих миров проектов - и человеческих, и нет. ... Миры возникают и такими способами - и благодаря им мы учимся смотреть и по сторонам, а не исключительно вперед.”

“Logically, federalism, brought to its ultimate consequences, applied not only to the different places people inhabit but also to the various functions they perform in society, right to the commune, to whatever association, up to the individual, means the same thing as anarchy - free and sovereign units that associate for the common benefit.”

“If the ‘heathen’ — that is, the German and the French teachers — were regarded with little respect, the teacher of writing, Ebert, who was a German Jew, was a real martyr. To be insolent with him was a sort of chic amongst the pages. His poverty alone must have been the reason why he kept to his lesson in our corps. The old hands, who had stayed for two or three years in the fifth form without moving higher up, treated him very badly; but by some means or other he had made an agreement with them: ‘One frolic during each lesson, but no more’ — an agreement which, I am afraid, was not always honestly kept on our side. One day, one of the residents of the remote peninsula soaked the blackboard sponge with ink and chalk and flung it at the calligraphy martyr. ‘Get it, Ebert!’ he shouted, with a stupid smile. The sponge touched Ebert’s shoulder, the grimy ink spirted into his face and down on to his white shirt. We were sure that this time Ebert would leave the room and report the fact to the inspector. But he only exclaimed, as he took out his cotton handkerchief and wiped his face, ‘Gentlemen, one frolic — no more to-day! The shirt is spoiled,’ he added in a subdued voice, and continued to correct someone’s book. We looked stupefied and ashamed. Why, instead of reporting, he had thought at once of the agreement! The feelings of the whole class turned in his favour. ‘What you have done is stupid,’ we reproached our comrade. ‘He is a poor man, and you have spoiled his shirt! Shame!’ somebody cried. The culprit went at once to make excuses. ‘One must learn, sir,’ was all that Ebert said in reply, with sadness in his voice. All became silent after that, and at the next lesson, as if we had settled it beforehand, most of us wrote in our best possible handwriting, and took our books to Ebert, asking him to correct them. He was radiant, he felt happy that day. This fact deeply impressed me, and was never wiped out from my memory. To this day I feel grateful to that remarkable man for his lesson.”