“Teachers seeking to 'teach the controversy' over Darwinian evolution in today's climate will likely be met with false warnings that it is unconstitutional to say anything negative about Darwinian evolution. Students who attempt to raise questions about Darwinism, or who try to elicit from the teacher an honest answer about the status of intelligent design theory will trigger administrators' concerns about whether they stand in Constitutional jeopardy. A chilling effect on open inquiry is being felt in several states already, including Ohio. South Carolina, and Pennsylvania. [District Court] Judge Jones's message is clear: give Darwin only praise, or else face the wrath of the judiciary.” ScienceEvolutionBiologyDarwinismIntelligent DesignIdMacroevolutionMacro EvolutionScientific Inquiry Book:Traipsing Into Evolution: Intelligent Design and the Kitzmiller v. Dover Decision Source: Traipsing Into Evolution: Intelligent Design and the Kitzmiller v. Dover Decision