“Loftus was asked to be an expert witness because the idea of memories as formed through a manipulable process of rehearsal is important to new views of memory and her own research. In the course of her testimony, the prosecutor skeptically asked: "You really don't know anything about five-year old children who have been sexually abused do you?" At that moment a "memory flew out at me, out of the blackness of the past, hitting me full force." She answers the prosecutor, "I do know something about this subject because I was abused when I was six years old" (149). With the force of a blow, a forgotten and apparently unrehearsed memory of being abused by a baby-sitter suddenly emerges after many years, its truth uneasily opposed to the falsehood of children's "rehearsed" memories or "contaminated" memories that she produces in her laboratory to show memories are but "mist" (4). Nonetheless, in her second popular book, The Myth of Repressed Memory, she argues against the existence of "repressed" memories...” RepressionIncestRepressed MemoriesFalse MemoriesChild Abuse SurvivorTrauma MemoryRepressed MemoryFalse Memory MythElizabeth Loftus Book:Telling Incest: Narratives of Dangerous Remembering from Stein to Sapphire Source: Telling Incest: Narratives of Dangerous Remembering from Stein to Sapphire