Suffering-Focused Ethics: Defense and I... A source page for quotes linked to Magnus Vinding. 0 quotes
Speciesism: Why It Is Wrong and the Imp... A source page for quotes linked to Magnus Vinding. 0 quotes
“There is, to be sure, a risk that interventions to help wild animals will end up making things worse, which highlights the importance of a well-informed and cautious approach to compassionate intervention. Yet this is very different from a stance of moral defeatism that simply dismisses the issue out of hand.” SufferingCompassionEthicsWild Animal Suffering Book:Reasoned Politics Source: Reasoned Politics
“Another reason it is much easier to bring about suffering than happiness is that suffering is, in a sense, the default state that creeps in on us if we do not make an effort to avoid it. For example, if we do not make an effort to eat well and exercise, poor health and misery will ensue.” Suffering Book:Suffering-Focused Ethics: Defense and Implications Source: Suffering-Focused Ethics: Defense and Implications
“On my account, this is simply a fact about consciousness: the experience of suffering is inherently bad, and this badness carries normative force - it carries a property of this ought not occur that is all too clear, undeniable even, in the moment one experiences it. We do not derive this property. We experience it directly.” Suffering Book:Suffering-Focused Ethics: Defense and Implications Source: Suffering-Focused Ethics: Defense and Implications
“... many authors have defended the moral and political importance of reducing suffering, and hardly anyone has argued against it. Yet this view has nonetheless been largely ignored in the mainstream discourse within political philosophy, in large part, I think, because it lacks texture and has limited stickiness in our minds, unlike concepts such as justice and equality, which seem more intuitively appealing to most people.” SufferingPoliticsSuffering Focused Ethics Book:Reasoned Politics Source: Reasoned Politics
“... the reality is that we do not live in a world in which most people are strongly dedicated to the aim of reducing suffering for all sentient beings — at least not in terms of their actual behavior. However, most people probably are willing to support policies that reduce suffering if only the cost is sufficiently low to them personally, which suggests that a promising strategy for those who are most dedicated to reducing suffering is to tap into this vast reservoir of potential support, making marginal pushes in just the right places such that our efforts inspire broad support rather than broad hostility.” SufferingPoliticsEffective AltruismAnimal Advocacy Book:Reasoned Politics Source: Reasoned Politics
“... wild animals suffer from a wide range of harms regardless of their reproductive strategies, including hunger, disease, parasitism, and natural disasters. These harms often cause intense suffering, and we should not disregard this suffering merely because the sufferers happen to live in the wild, or because they happen to have non-human bodies. We rightly acknowledge a moral duty to relieve intense suffering experienced by humans, including when it is due to natural causes, and there is no justification for restricting this moral duty to humans only ... .” SufferingEthicsVeganismSpeciesismWild Animal Suffering Book:Reasoned Politics Source: Reasoned Politics
“The point of the term “suffering-focused ethics” is ... not to be a novel or impressive contribution to ethical theorizing, but instead to serve as a pragmatic concept that can unite as effective a coalition as possible toward the shared aim of making a real-world difference — to reduce suffering for sentient beings.” SufferingEthicsCooperationCommon GroundSuffering Focused EthicsPractical Ethics Book:Suffering-Focused Ethics: Defense and Implications Source: Suffering-Focused Ethics: Defense and Implications
“.. [M]uch suffering serves absolutely no function and entails no silver lining whatsoever, such as the suffering endured by countless [non-human animals] every second who are eaten alive while fully conscious and unable to escape, or the suffering entailed by debilitating chronic pain. The world contains vast amounts of such useless suffering, and we should all be able to agree that this suffering is worth preventing.” SufferingEthicsAnti Speciesism Book:Suffering-Focused Ethics: Defense and Implications Source: Suffering-Focused Ethics: Defense and Implications
“Being forced to endure torture rather than dreamless sleep, or an otherwise neutral state, would be a tragedy of a fundamentally different kind than being forced to “endure” a neutral state instead of a state of maximal bliss.” SufferingEthicsBlissUtilitarianismAsymmetry Book:Suffering-Focused Ethics: Defense and Implications Source: Suffering-Focused Ethics: Defense and Implications
“... the notion that happiness and suffering are morally symmetric deserves our most meticulous scrutiny. It may, of course, seem intuitive to assume that some kind of symmetry must obtain, and to superimpose a certain interval of the real numbers onto the range of happiness and suffering we can experience — from minus ten to plus ten, say. Yet we have to be extremely cautious about such naively intuitive moves of conceptualization. … [I]t is especially true when our ethical priorities hinge on these conceptual models; when they can determine, for instance, whether we find it acceptable to allow astronomical amounts of suffering to occur in order to create “even greater” amounts of happiness.” HappinessSufferingEthicsUtilitarianismPrioritization Book:Suffering-Focused Ethics: Defense and Implications Source: Suffering-Focused Ethics: Defense and Implications
“… a problematic feeling is indeed the exact opposite of an unproblematic feeling. Yet the fact that two states are each others’ opposites in this sense does not imply they are symmetric in the sense of being able to morally outweigh each other or meaningfully cancel each other out. Consider, by analogy, the states of being below and above water respectively. ... one can say that, in one sense, being 50 meters below water is the opposite of being 50 meters above water. But this does not mean, quite obviously, that a symmetry exists between these respective states in terms of their value and moral significance. Indeed, there is a sense in which it matters much more to have one’s head just above the water surface than it does to get it higher up still.” SufferingEthicsAnalogyUtilitarianismPrioritizationSuffering Focused Ethics Book:Suffering-Focused Ethics: Defense and Implications Source: Suffering-Focused Ethics: Defense and Implications
“... when we take into account what we know about happiness and suffering in psychological and neuroscientific terms, we find reasons to doubt that (to use Popper’s phrase) we can treat degrees of pain as “negative degrees of pleasure”, and to doubt that pleasure can ethically “cancel out” pain — any more than putting people far above a water surface can cancel out or outweigh the bad of putting people far below it.” HappinessSufferingEthicsUtilitarianism Book:Suffering-Focused Ethics: Defense and Implications Source: Suffering-Focused Ethics: Defense and Implications
“... if suffering warrants special moral concern, the truth is that we should never forget about its existence. For even if we had abolished suffering throughout the living world, there would still be a risk that it might reemerge, and this risk would always be worth reducing.” SufferingResponsibilityAbolitionismSuffering Focused EthicsNegative Utilitarianism Book:Suffering-Focused Ethics: Defense and Implications Source: Suffering-Focused Ethics: Defense and Implications
“Disaster on an unfathomable scale is always taking place on Earth. Countless instances of extreme suffering are occurring in this moment — right now. Yet because this suffering is so normal and ordinary, simply occurring every day, distributed rather evenly over time and space, it seems less evocative and urgent than the more unusual, more localized disasters, such as school shootings and earthquakes. Almost all the suffering that occurs on Earth can be considered baseline horror, which allows us to ignore it. We simply do not feel the ever-present emergency that surrounds us.” HappinessSufferingEthicsVeganismPlanetSuffering Focused Ethics Book:Suffering-Focused Ethics: Defense and Implications Source: Suffering-Focused Ethics: Defense and Implications
“I am not suggesting we should be skeptical of the notion that life can get a lot better. Yet this should not be confused with the question of whether any better state we can reasonably expect to bring about — such as a much happier state — can ever morally outweigh all the suffering its creation would entail, including the (risk of) extreme suffering.” HappinessSufferingProgressEthicsVeganismSuffering Focused Ethics Author:Magnus Vinding
“The freedom of people to organize themselves as they want is just as important for curbing totalitarianism — and for addressing other problems — as is the freedom to speak up against these things. The freedom to use words is of limited value without the freedom to put action behind them.” Civil LibertiesEconomic FreedomFreedom Of Assembly Book:Reasoned Politics Source: Reasoned Politics
“No group of humans has ever been held in as low regard or exploited on anything close to the same level as non-human beings have been throughout history and still are today. No group of humans has ever been systematically bred, raised, killed, and eaten. No group of humans has ever been born and raised in order for people to make basketballs, wallets, or boots out of their skin. No, there is no comparison. No group of humans has ever truly been “treated like animals”.” SpeciesismSentientism Book:Speciesism: Why It Is Wrong and the Implications of Rejecting It Source: Speciesism: Why It Is Wrong and the Implications of Rejecting It
“While it must be acknowledged that modern political systems work well in a number of ways, especially compared to those systems that wholly suppress civil liberties, it is also true that our political culture and ways of thinking about politics remain starkly underdeveloped and suboptimal in many ways. At the level of our individual thinking, collective norms, and the overarching cultural frameworks with which we tackle politics, there is great potential to do better.” We Can Do Better Book:Reasoned Politics Source: Reasoned Politics