Quotessence
Home / Quotes / Quote by Janice G. Raymond

Quote by Janice G. Raymond

“Transgenderism is a contrived ideology born of a regressive biologism that, in its latest version, champions men who claim female brains and female penises. It’s a rogue idea, an unscrupulous philosophy that, to modify Virginia Woolf ’s words, serves as a looking glass “possessing the magic and delicious power of reflecting the figure of man” back to himself as the woman he aspires to be (Woolf, 1929, p. 35). Self-declared women (men) spend a lot of time in front of any mirror that reflects their idealized women back to themselves.”

Quote by Janice G. Raymond

Book:Doublethink: A Feminist Challenge to Transgenderism
Create image

Work

Doublethink: A Feminist Challenge to Transgenderism

Browse quotes and source details for this work. more

Author

Janice G. Raymond

Browse famous quotes and profile details for Janice G. Raymond. more

You May Also Like

“Trans activists insist that these groups change references to women’s vaginas or breast-feeding and instead call women ‘front holes’ or ‘chest feeders’. Yet it’s OK for self-declared women to be preoccupied with natal women’s reproductive functions in their quest for womb transplants and ability to breast feed, in trans speak known as ‘chest feeding’. Others define natal women as ‘menstruators, egg producers, breeders, uterus owners, or non-men’, terms that degrade and dehumanize and reduce women to body parts. When feminists resist, we are decried as transphobes. We have come to a point where even those who ‘identify’ as feminists seem eager to cede the definition of woman to men.”

FeminismRadical FeminismGender Ideology
Book:Doublethink: A Feminist Challenge to Transgenderism
Create image

“Como he dicho, el caso de La Manada y el libro de Nerea Barjola hicieron que muchas periodistas nos cuestionáramos la forma en que cubríamos las historias de violencia sexual: ¿qué es necesario contar?, ¿qué detalles sirven para explicar lo que sucedió y cuáles son solo morbo?, ¿eso solo depende de la forma y del contexto en que lo cuentes?, ¿está sirviendo este relato para concienciar o está sirviendo para atemorizar?, ¿estamos contando la violencia sexual de una forma que pueda despertar a la sociedad o lo que estamos haciendo es asustar más a las mujeres?, ¿estamos poniendo el foco en la estructura o lo estamos poniendo en las particularidades que impiden que la gente reconozca que esa violencia es producto de un sistema mucho más complejo?”

FeminismFeminismoSociedadPeriodismoPreocupación Social
Book:Feminismo vibrante: Si no hay placer no es nuestra revolución
Create image

“We must therefore distinguish the necessary feminist demand for “equal pay for equal work” from the equally important need to keep some parts of our social, cultural, and spiritual life out of the marketplace. We must not convert all gift labors into market work lest we wake one day to see that universal market in which all our actions earn a wage and all our goods and services bear a price. There is a place for volunteer labor, for mutual aid, for in-house work, for healings that require sympathetic contact or a cohesive support group, for strengthening the bonds of kinship, for intellectual community, for creative idleness, for the slow maturation of talent, for the creation and preservation and dissemination of culture, and so on. To quit the confines of our current system of gender means not to introduce market value into these labors but to recognize that they are not “female” but human tasks. And to break the system that oppresses women, we need not convert all gift labor to cash work; we need, rather, to admit women to the “male,” money-making jobs while at the same time including supposedly “female” tasks and forms of exchange in our sense of possible masculinity.”

FeminismGenderWage Gap
Book:The Gift: Imagination and the Erotic Life of Property
Create image

“The sensible women who, if they wanted, would certainly be able to qualify themselves for the world of discussion and ideas, are precisely those who, if they are not qualified, never try to enter it or to destroy it. They have other fish to fry. At a mixed party they gravitate to one end of the room and talk women’s talk to one another. They don’t want us, for this sort of purpose, any more than we want them. It is only the riff-raff of each sex that wants to be incessantly hanging on the other. Live and let live. They laugh at us a good deal. That is just as it should be. Where the sexes, having no real shared activities, can meet only in Affection and Eros— cannot be Friends—it is healthy that each should have a lively sense of the other’s absurdity. Indeed it is always healthy. No one ever really appreciated the other sex—just as no one really appreciates children Friendship or animals—without at times feeling them to be funny. For both sexes are. Humanity is tragi-comical; but the division into sexes enables each to see in the other the joke that often escapes it in itself—and the pathos too.”

FeminismEqualityDifferenceEgalitarianism
Book:The Four Loves
Create image

“The brilliance of objectification as a strategy of dominance is that it gets the woman to take the initiative in her own degradation (having less freedom is degrading). The woman herself takes one kind of responsibility absolutely and thus commits herself to her own continuing inferiority: she polices her own body; she internalizes the demands of the dominant class and, in order to be fucked, she constructs her life around meeting those demands. It is the best system of colonialization on earth.”

FeminismGender
Book:Intercourse
Create image