Quotessence
Home / Quotes / Quote by Ludwig Wittgenstein

Quote by Ludwig Wittgenstein

Work

Philosophical Investigations

Ludwig Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations is a profound and influential text that delves into the complexities of human thought and understanding. The book is structured as a series of dialogues and reflections, examining concepts such as meaning, truth, and the nature of philosophical problems. Wittgenstein challenges traditional philosophical assumptions and proposes a new approach to understanding language and its role in shaping our perceptions of the world. more

Author

Ludwig Wittgenstein
Ludwig Wittgenstein

Ludwig Wittgenstein was one of the most important philosophers of the 20th century, renowned for his profound contributions to language, logic, and philosophical methods. His ideas have had a significant impact on the development of analytic philosophy and philosophy of language. more

You May Also Like

“'Imagine a person whose memory could not retain what the word 'pain' meant-so that he constantly called different things by that name-but nevertheless used the word in a way fitting in with the usual symptoms and presuppositions of pain'-in short he uses it as we all do. Here I should like to say: a wheel that can be turned though nothing else moves with it, is not part of the mechanism.”

“...monetary exchanges have interesting things in common; Gresham's law, if true, says what one of these interesting things is. But what is interesting about monetary exchanges is surely not their commonalities under physical description. A natural kind like a monetary exchange could turn out to be co-extensive with a physical natural kind; but if it did, that would be an accident on a cosmic scale.”

“There are lots of cases where we know more about how the world works than we do about how we know how it works. That's no paradox. Understanding the structure of galaxies is one thing, understanding how we understand the structure of galaxies is quite another. There isn't the slightest reason why the first should wait on the second and, in point of historical fact, it didn't. This bears a lot of emphasis; it turns up in philosophy practically everywhere you look.”