Quotessence
Home / Quotes / Quote by Scarlett Johansson

Quote by Scarlett Johansson

“I wouldn't say I'm a serial monogamist ... I mean, I went through periods of time when I was, ah, single. But when I'm in a relationship, I'm in a relationship.”

Quote by Scarlett Johansson

Author

Scarlett Johansson
Scarlett Johansson

Scarlett Johansson (born November 22, 1984) is an American actress and singer. She is one of the highest-grossing box office stars of all time, best known for playing Natasha Romanoff / Black Widow in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Johansson began acting as a child and gained critical acclaim for her roles in Lost in Translation (2003) and Girl with a Pearl Earring (2003). She has received a BAFTA Award and nominations for five Golden Globes and an Academy Award. In addition to blockbusters, she has starred in independent films such as Her, Under the Skin, and Marriage Story. Johansson is also a philanthropist and activist, supporting women's rights and refugee causes. She was named one of Time's 100 most influential people in 2019. more

You May Also Like

“I once heard that women dress for women -- not for men -- and I think that has some truth to it. Men, what do they know? They don't know if you gain or lose five pounds. They're oblivious to those kinds of things. A lot of men will say "I like you just as you are." And you're like "But I'm bloated!" If they're attracted to you, they're attracted to you.”

“Ordinary Americans, and especially the small minority active in Democrat and Republican primaries, must learn more of what people across the globe are thinking and saying about the US. For if you follow that, you realise that the erosion of American power is happening faster than most of us predicted -- while the politicians in Washington behave like rutting stags with locked antlers.”

“Except for its worst inner-city slums, America is not the primitive capitalist jungle of European imagination, where human beings slink away like wounded animals to die in bloodstained holes.”

“The trouble is that privacy is at once essential to, and in tension with, both freedom and security. A cabinet minister who keeps his mistress in satin sheets at the French taxpayer's expense cannot justly object when the press exposes his misuse of public funds. Our freedom to scrutinise the conduct of public figures trumps that minister's claim to privacy. The question is: where and how do we draw the line between a genuine public interest and that which is merely what interests the public?”