Home / Quotes / Quote by Michael Badnarik

Quote by Michael Badnarik

“I am a very peaceful man. I love people and am known for my gregarious personality. However, if you try to confiscate my guns, I will feel compelled to give them to you, one bullet at a time.”

Quote by Michael Badnarik

Author

Michael Badnarik

Michael Badnarik is an American political figure born on August 1, 1954. He has a rich experience in politics and has played an active role in public affairs. more

You May Also Like

“Marriage partners, not government, should define the terms and spiritual orientation of their union in accordance with our nation's guarantee of religious freedom.”

Should Government Spiritual Nations Term Religious Unions Partners Guarantees Orientation Religious Freedom

Author:Michael Badnarik

“The Patriot Act makes a mockery of the Sixth Amendment, which protects your right to a speedy and public trial, and your right to the assistance of counsel for your defense.”

Protect Defense Trials Amendments Patriot Assistance Mockery Patriot Act

Author:Michael Badnarik

“The strong appearance of design [in nature] allows a disarmingly simple argument: if it looks, walks and quacks like a duck, then, absent compelling evidence to the contrary, we have warrant to conclude it's a duck. Design should not be overlooked simply because it's so obvious.”

Ifs Should Looks Strong Simple Walks Design Evidence Argument Obvious Appearance Contrary Ducks Compelling Absent Overlooked Warrants Quacks Design In Nature

Author:Michael Behe

“Under my definition, a scientific theory is a proposed explanation which focuses or points to physical, observable data and logical inferences. There are many things throughout the history of science which we now think to be incorrect which nonetheless would fit that which would fit that definition. Yes, astrology is in fact one.”

Thinking Facts Theory Fit Definitions Data Explanation Logical Astrology Inference History Of Science Scientific Theory

Author:Michael Behe

“The result of [the] cumulative efforts to investigate the cell - to investigate life at the molecular level - is a loud, clear, piercing cry of 'design!' The result is so unambiguous and so significant that it must be ranked as one of the greatest achievements in the history of science. The discovery rivals those of Newton and Einstein, Lavoisier and Schrödinger, Pasteur, and Darwin. The observation of the intelligent design of life is as momentous as the observation that the earth goes around the sun.”

“If you search the scientific literature on evolution, and if you focus your search on the question of how molecular machines - the basis of life - developed, you find an eerie and complete silence. The complexity of life's foundation has paralyzed science's attempt to account for it; molecular machines raise an as-yet-impenetrable barrier to Darwinism's universal reach.”

Ifs Literature Silence Focus Evolution Machines Universal Accounts Bases Raises Foundation Complexity Barriers Darwinism Paralyzed Eerie

Author:Michael Behe

“Molecular evolution is not based on scientific authority. . . . There are assertions that such evolution occurred, but absolutely none are supported by pertinent experiments or calculations. Since no one knows molecular evolution by direct experience, and since there is no authority on which to base claims of knowledge, it can truly be said that . . . the assertion of Darwinian molecular evolution is merely bluster.”

Knows Said Evolution Authority Direct Claims Experiments Calculations Assertion Pertinent Bluster

Author:Michael Behe

“I think the people that Barack Obama has been associating with are anti-American, by and large.”

People Thinking Has Beens Barack Anti-american

Author:Michele Bachmann

“I never questioned Barack Obama's patriotism.”

Author:Michele Bachmann

“I now say that the world has the technology - either available or well advanced in the research pipeline - to feed on a sustainable basis a population of 10 billion people. The more pertinent question today is whether farmers and ranchers will be permitted to use this new technology? While the affluent nations can certainly afford to adopt ultra low-risk positions, and pay more for food produced by the so-called "organic" methods, the one billion chronically undernourished people of the low income, food-deficit nations cannot.”