Quotessence
Home / Quotes / Quote by Christopher Lasch

Quote by Christopher Lasch

“The difficulty of limiting the influence of wealth suggests that wealth itself needs to be limited. When money talks, everybody else is condemned to listen. For that reason a democratic society cannot allow unlimited accumulation. Social and civic equality presuppose at least a rough approximation of economic equality. A "plurality of spheres," as Walzer calls it, is eminently desirable, and we should do everything possible to enforce the boundaries among them. But we also need to remember that boundaries are permeable, especially where money is concerned, that a moral condemnation of great wealth must inform any defense of the free market, and that moral condemnation must be backed up with effective political action.”

Quote by Christopher Lasch

Work

The Revolt of the Elites and the Betrayal of Democracy

This book delves into the transformation of political landscapes, analyzing how the elite have become disconnected from the democratic process and the needs of the general population. more

Author

Christopher Lasch
Christopher Lasch

Christopher Lasch (June 1, 1932 - February 14, 1994) was an American historian known for his critical analysis of modern American culture and society. His work explored themes such as individualism, consumerism, and the decline of morality, which had a profound impact on contemporary American society. more

You May Also Like

“Because [Jeff Bezos] and [Mark Zuckerberg] own $100 billion in the current state of the legal system, the current state of the fiscal system, the current way the international economy is organised, people say, ‘OK, $100 billion, exactly the right level.’ But with a different legal system, different international taxation, it could be 200, it could be 50. So what would be the story? Any level that they will attain, it will be the best? This kind of sacralisation of special individuals is a form of religious thought. People who use this kind of argument: ‘He's great, therefore –‘ therefore what? Therefore we should subsidize him so that he's even richer?”