Quotessence
Home / Quotes / Quote by Leighton Brown

Quote by Leighton Brown

“Changing the social order in one fell swoop, Henry Gerber wrote in 1940, is “like trying to push over a big stone wall with your skull.” It can’t be done. But “we can undermine the wall by little individual blasts and it will topple down by-and-by.” Or, as Del Shearer said in 1965, social revolution required at least “a century of subtle attack” on the dominant culture. As riots engulfed the United States in 1968, Frank Kameny saw similarities between homophiles and those Black Americans taking to the streets to express centuries of anger. “BUT,” Kameny said, “the Negro has truly explored and exhausted well-neigh, if not actually all, other avenues, and has gotten to the firm, unyielding stone wall of prejudice which blocks them. WE have run into this, but have not yet reached the end of all avenues.” Queer people soon hit the end of all avenues, crashing into an unyielding stone wall.”

Quote by Leighton Brown

Work

Author

Leighton Brown

Browse famous quotes and profile details for Leighton Brown. more

You May Also Like

“The unrest that took place. Somehow, we need to talk about it and address it. We need to educated and discuss on what really happen. How it started. What caused it and what fuel it. If not , we are in danger ,because there are some people who benefited from it, and they are not looking at the damage caused by it. So, they will make sure that it happens again.”

“लाश ! यह शब्द कितना घिनौना है ! आदमी अपनी मौत से अपने घर में, अपने बाल-बच्चों के सामने मरता है तब भी बिना आत्मा के उस बदन को लाश ही कहते हैं। और आदमी सड़क पर किसी बलवाई के हाथों मारा जाता है, तब भी बिना आत्मा के उस बदन को लाश ही कहते हैं। भाषा कितनी ग़रीब होती है ! शब्दों का कैसा ज़बरदस्त काल है ! कितनी शर्म की बात है कि हम घर पर मरनेवाले और बलवे में मारे जानेवाले में फ़र्क नहीं कर सकते, जबकि घर पर केवल एक व्यक्ति मरता है और बलवाइयों के हाथों परम्परा मरती है, सभ्यता मरती है, इतिहास मरता है। कबीर की राम की बहुरिया मरती है। जायसी की पद्मावती मरती है। कुतुबन की मृगावती मरती है, सूर की राधा मरती है। वारिस की हीर मरती है। तुलसी के राम मरते हैं। अनीस के हुसैन मरते हैं। कोई लाशों के इस अम्बार को नहीं देखता । हम लाशें गिनते हैं। सात आदमी मरे। चौदह दूकानें लुटीं । दस घरों में आग लगा दी गई। जैसे कि घर, दूकान और आदमी केवल शब्द हैं जिन्हें शब्दकोशों से निकालकर वातावरण में मँडराने के लिए छोड़ दिया गया हो !...”

“I followed along with Sky News and BBC News during the UK 2024 riots. The BBC News feed distinctly changed after it emerged the killer of the young girls was a BBC TV star. The Sky news feed distinctly changed after the rioting did not stop. After a week of watching both of them, I never trusted either news feed and started to get my news from social media. Both channels reported the Banksy police box artwork as ‘fish’ when they were flesh eating piranhas!”

“The fundamental defect of the female character is a lack of a sense of justice. This originates first and foremost in their want of rationality and capacity for reflexion but it is strengthened by the fact that, as the weaker sex, they are driven to rely not on force but on cunning: hence their instinctive subtlety and their ineradicable tendency to tell lies: for, as nature has equipped the lion with claws and teeth, the elephant with tusks, the wild boar with fangs, the bull with horns and the cuttlefish with ink, so it has equipped woman with the power of dissimulation as her means of attack and defence, and has transformed into this gift all the strength it has bestowed on man in the form of physical strength and the power of reasoning. Dissimulation is thus inborn in her and consequently to be found in the stupid woman almost as often as in the clever one. To make use of it at every opportunity is as natural to her as it is for an animal to employ its means of defence whenever it is attacked, and when she does so she feels that to some extent she is only exercising her rights. A completely truthful woman who does not practice dissimulation is perhaps an impossibility, which is why women see through the dissimulation of others so easily it is inadvisable to attempt it with them. – But this fundamental defect which I have said they possess, together with all that is associated with it, gives rise to falsity, unfaithfulness, treachery, ingratitude, etc. Women are guilty of perjury far more often than men. It is questionable whether they ought to be allowed to take an oath at all.”