“What I should have said is that he thinks that there is a conflict between evolutionary biology and theism. Dennett thinks that evolutionary theory shows that it is irrational to believe that God exists; he thinks that the theory has this consequence because he thinks that the Design Argument was the only remotely plausible argument for God’s existence and evolutionary theory destroyed that argument.” ScienceDesignEvolutionEvolutionary BiologyDaniel DennettDesign ArgumentDesign Argument Debunked Author:Elliott Sober
“The claim of fine tuning is subjective. As I stated before, no measurement in physics is perfect. The amount of precision we demand can be increased or decreased at our whim. We could have an approximate measurement that has a huge margin of error and call it finely-tuned if we so desire. Theists, in particular, have a lot of such desire. They so badly want God to be an indispensable part of our universe's creation, so they see finely-tuned constants. They also tend to sweep under the rug the following fact: the vast majority of our universe is hostile to life, and they fail to consider that another hand in the proverbial deck might yield a better universe than ours, one teaming with life on every planet throughout the cosmos.” AtheismFine TuningAtheist ArgumentFine Tuning Argument DebunkedDesign Argument Debunked Book:Debunking Darwin's God: A Case Against BioLogos and Theistic Evolution Source: Debunking Darwin's God: A Case Against BioLogos and Theistic Evolution