Quotessence
Home / Topics / Neo Darwinism Quotes

Neo Darwinism Quotes

Browse 14 quotes about Neo Darwinism.

Neo Darwinism Quotes

“No fossil is buried with its birth certificate. That, and the scarcity of fossils, means that it is effectively impossible to link fossils into chains of cause and effect in any valid way... To take a line of fossils and claim that they represent a lineage is not a scientific hypothesis that can be tested, but an assertion that carries the same validity as a bedtime story—amusing, perhaps even instructive, but not scientific.”

ScienceEvolutionBiologyFossilsDarwinismDarwinPaleontologyMacroevolutionMacro EvolutionNeo DarwinismConfessions Of The DarwinistsDarwinist ConfessionsFossil Record
Book:In Search of Deep Time: Beyond the Fossil Record to a New History of Life
Create image

“Genetics might be adequate for explaining microevolution, but microevolutionary changes in gene frequency were not seen as able to turn a reptile into a mammal or to convert a fish into an amphibian. Microevolution looks at adaptations that concern the survival of the fittest, not the arrival of the fittest... The origin of species — Darwin’s problem — remains unsolved.”

ScienceEvolutionBiologyDarwinismDarwinMacroevolutionMacro EvolutionNeo DarwinismConfessions Of The DarwinistsDarwinist Confessions
Author:Scott F. Gilbert
Create image

“Ewww... intelligent design people! They're just buck-toothed, Bible-pushing nincompoops with community-college degrees who're trying to sell a gussied-up creationism to a cretinous public! No need to address their concerns or respond to their arguments. They are Not Science. They are poopy-heads. There. I just saved you the trouble of reading 90 percent of the responses to the ID position... This is how losers act just before they lose: arrogant, self-satisfied, too important to be bothered with substantive refutation, and disdainful of their own faults... The only remaining question is whether Darwinism will exit gracefully, or whether it will go down biting, screaming, censoring, and denouncing to the bitter end. — Tech Central Station contributor Douglas Kern, 2005”

ScienceEvolutionBiologyDarwinismIntelligent DesignScientific RevolutionIdMacroevolutionMacro EvolutionNeo DarwinismDouglas KernNeodarwinism
Book:The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design
Create image

“For those scientists who take it seriously, Darwinian evolution has functioned more as a philosophical belief system than as a testable scientific hypothesis. This quasi-religious function of the theory is, I think, what lies behind many of the extreme statements that you have doubtless encountered from some scientists opposing any critical analysis of neo-Darwinism in the classroom. It is also why many scientists make public statements about the theory that they would not defend privately to other scientists like me.”

ScienceEvolutionBiologyDarwinismDarwinMacroevolutionMacro EvolutionNeo Darwinism
Author:James A. Shapiro
Create image

“[...] if truth be told, evolution hasn’t yielded many practical or commercial benefits. Yes, bacteria evolve drug resistance, and yes, we must take countermeasures, but beyond that there is not much to say. Evolution cannot help us predict what new vaccines to manufacture because microbes evolve unpredictably. But hasn’t evolution helped guide animal and plant breeding? Not very much. Most improvement in crop plants and animals occurred long before we knew anything about evolution, and came about by people following the genetic principle of ‘like begets like’. Even now, as its practitioners admit, the field of quantitative genetics has been of little value in helping improve varieties. Future advances will almost certainly come from transgenics, which is not based on evolution at all. [review of The Evolving World: Evolution in Everyday Life, Nature 442, 983-984 (31 August 2006)]”

ScienceEvolutionBiologySpeculationDarwinismConjectureDarwinMacroevolutionMacro EvolutionPseudo ScienceNeo DarwinismConfessions Of The DarwinistsDarwinist Confessions
Author:Jerry A. Coyne
Create image

“The phrase 'the fossil record' sounds impressive and authoritative. As used by some persons it becomes, as intended, intimidating, taking on the aura of esoteric truth as expounded by an elite class of specialists. But what is it, really, this fossil record? Only data in search of interpretation. All claims to the contrary that I know, and I know of several, are so much superstition.”

ScienceEvolutionBiologyFossilsDarwinismDarwinPaleontologyMacroevolutionMacro EvolutionNeo DarwinismFossil Record
Author:Gareth J. Nelson
Create image

“In science's pecking order, evolutionary biology lurks somewhere near the bottom, far closer to phrenology than to physics. For evolutionary biology is a historical science, laden with history's inevitable imponderables. We evolutionary biologists cannot generate a Cretaceous Park to observe exactly what killed the dinosaurs; and, unlike "harder" scientists, we usually cannot resolve issues with a simple experiment, such as adding tube A to tube B and noting the color of the mixture.”

ScienceEvolutionBiologySpeculationDarwinismConjectureDarwinMacroevolutionMacro EvolutionPseudo ScienceNeo DarwinismConfessions Of The DarwinistsDarwinist Confessions
Author:Jerry A. Coyne
Create image

“I recently asked more than seventy eminent researchers if they would have done I their work differently if they had thought Darwin's theory was wrong. The responses were all the same: no. I also examined the outstanding biodiscoveries of the past century: the discovery of the double helix; the characterization of the ribosome: the mapping of genomes; research on medications and drug reactions: improvements in food production and sanitation; the development of new surgeries; and others. I even queried biologists working in areas where one would expect the Darwinian paradigm to have most benefited research, such as the emergence of resistance to antibiotics and pesticides. Here, as elsewhere, I found that Darwin's theory had provided no discernible guidance, but was brought in, after the breakthroughs, as an interesting narrative gloss.”

ScienceEvolutionBiologyDarwinismDarwinMacroevolutionMacro EvolutionNeo Darwinism
Book:Why do we invoke Darwin? Evolutionary theory contributes little to experimental biology
Create image

“Throughout 150 years of the science of bacteriology, there is no evidence that one species of bacteria has changed into another... Since there is no evidence for species changes between the simplest forms of unicellular life, it is not surprising that there is no evidence for evolution from prokaryotic [i.e., bacterial] to eukaryotic [i.e., plant and animal] cells, let alone throughout the whole array of higher multicellular organisms.”

ScienceEvolutionBiologyDarwinismDarwinMacroevolutionMacro EvolutionNeo Darwinism
Author:Alan H. Linton
Create image

“I am absolutely convinced of the lack of true scientific evidence in favour of Darwinian dogma. Nobody in the biological sciences, medicine included, needs Darwinism at all. Darwinism is certainly needed, however, in order to pose as a philosopher, since it is primarily a worldview. And an awful one, as George Bernard Shaw used to say.”

ScienceEvolutionBiologyDarwinismDarwinMacroevolutionMacro EvolutionNeo DarwinismGeorge Bernard Shaw
Author:Raul O. Leguizamon
Create image

“All disciplines of science are built on the causality of the relationships governing related events. Yet the theory of evolution is built upon the idea of accidental changes that resulted in complex living systems. I was unable to comprehend how the notion that an infinite number of random accidents systematically happened to produce living species, and kept improving these beings, is justified.”

ScienceEvolutionBiologyDarwinismDarwinMacroevolutionMacro EvolutionNeo Darwinism
Book:Clinging to a Myth: The Story Behind Evolution
Create image