“An interesting contrast between the geology of the present day and that of half a century ago, is presented by the complete emancipation of the modern geologist from the controlling and perverting influence of theology, all-powerful at the earlier date. As the geologist of my young days wrote, he had one eye upon fact, and the other on Genesis; at present, he wisely keeps both eyes on fact, and ignores the pentateuchal mythology altogether. The publication of the 'Principles of Geology' brought upon its illustrious author a period of social ostracism; the instruction given to our children is based upon those principles. Whewell had the courage to attack Lyell's fundamental assumption (which surely is a dictate of common sense) that we ought to exhaust known causes before seeking for the explanation of geological phenomena in causes of which we have no experience.” ScienceInfluenceExperienceMythMythologyTheologyCommon SenseScience And ReligionSupernaturalFactSuperstitionGenesisGeologyNaturalismScience Vs ReligionOstracismPentateuchMethodological NaturalismIllustriousCharles LyellLyellBiblical MythologyPrinciples Of Geology Book:Advance of Science in the Last Half-Century, The Source: Advance of Science in the Last Half-Century, The
“With the growth of civilisation in Europe, and with the revival of letters and of science in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, the ethical and intellectual criticism of theology once more recommenced, and arrived at a temporary resting-place in the confessions of the various reformed Protestant sects in the sixteenth century; almost all of which, as soon as they were strong enough, began to persecute those who carried criticism beyond their own limit. But the movement was not arrested by these ecclesiastical barriers, as their constructors fondly imagined it would be; it was continued, tacitly or openly, by Galileo, by Hobbes, by Descartes, and especially by Spinoza, in the seventeenth century; by the English Freethinkers, by Rousseau, by the French Encyclopaedists, and by the German Rationalists, among whom Lessing stands out a head and shoulders taller than the rest, throughout the eighteenth century; by the historians, the philologers, the Biblical critics, the geologists, and the biologists in the nineteenth century, until it is obvious to all who can see that the moral sense and the really scientific method of seeking for truth are once more predominating over false science. Once more ethics and theology are parting company.” ScienceCivilizationEuropeCriticismPersecutionScience And ReligionScience Vs ReligionHobbesSpinozaDescartesRousseauGalileoProtestantGalileo GalileiBaruch SpinozaDiderotGeologistsRene DescartesRené DescartesThomas HobbesBaron D HolbachD HolbachDenis DiderotJean MeslierLessingPaul Henri D HolbachGotthold Ephraim LessingGotthold LessingJean Jacque RousseauMeslier Book:The Evolution Of Theology: An Anthropological Study Source: The Evolution Of Theology: An Anthropological Study
“In the beginning of the eighteenth century, De Maillet made the first serious attempt to apply the doctrine [of evolution] to the living world. In the latter part of it, Erasmus Darwin, Goethe, and Lamarck took up the work more vigorously and with better qualifications. The question of special creation, or evolution, lay at the bottom of the fierce disputes which broke out in the French Academy between Cuvier and St.-Hilaire; and, for a time, the supporters of biological evolution were silenced, if not answered, by the alliance of the greatest naturalist of the age with their ecclesiastical opponents. Catastrophism, a short-sighted teleology, and a still more short-sighted orthodoxy, joined forces to crush evolution.” ScienceEvolutionScience And ReligionOrthodoxyScience Vs ReligionGoetheJohann Wolfgang Von GoetheCuvierErasmus DarwinGeorges CuvierLamarckBenoit De MailletBenoît De MailletDe MailletJean Baptiste LamarckTreviranus Book:Advance of Science in the Last Half-Century, The Source: Advance of Science in the Last Half-Century, The