Quotessence
Home / Quotes / Quote by Thomas Gilovich

Quote by Thomas Gilovich

“it seems that once again people engage in a search for evidence that is biased toward confirmation. Asked to assess the similarity of two entities, people pay more attention to the ways in which they are similar than to the ways in which they differ. Asked to assess dissimilarity, they become more concerned with differences than with similarities. In other words, when testing a hypothesis of similarity, people look for evidence of similarity rather than dissimilarity, and when testing a hypothesis of dissimilarity, they do the opposite. The relationship one perceives between two entities, then, can vary with the precise form of the question that is asked”

Quote by Thomas Gilovich

Book:How We Know What Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life
Create image

Work

How We Know What Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life

Browse quotes and source details for this work. more

Author

Thomas Gilovich
Thomas Gilovich

Thomas Gilovich is an esteemed psychologist born in the United States in 1954. He is known for his research in the field of cognitive psychology, particularly his work on decision-making and judgment. Professor Gilovich teaches at Cornell University and has published numerous papers on human cognitive biases and decision-making psychology. more

You May Also Like

“The principle we are examining may be called the principle of induction, and its two parts may be stated as follows: (a) When a thing of a certain sort A has been found to be associated with a thing of a certain other sort B, and has never been found dissociated from a thing of the sort B, the greater the number of cases in which A and B have been associated, the greater is the probability that they will be associated in a fresh case in which one of them is known to be present; (b) Under the same circumstances, a sufficient number of cases of association will make the probability of a fresh association nearly a certainty, and will make it approach certainty without limit.”

LogicInduction
Author:Bertrand Russell
Create image

“It remains to mention some of the ways in which people have spoken misleadingly of logical form. One of the commonest of these is to talk of 'the logical form' of a statement; as if a statement could never have more than one kind of formal power; as if statements could, in respect of their formal powers, be grouped in mutually exclusive classes, like animals at a zoo in respect of their species. But to say that a statement is of some one logical form is simply to point to a certain general class of, e.g., valid inferences, in which the statement can play a certain role. It is not to exclude the possibility of there being other general classes of valid inferences in which the statement can play a certain role”

LanguageLogic
Book:Introduction to Logical Theory
Create image