Quotessence
Home / Quotes / Quote by Anthony T. Hincks

Quote by Anthony T. Hincks

Author

Anthony T. Hincks

Browse famous quotes and profile details for Anthony T. Hincks. more

You May Also Like

“Nella vita di Guglielmo tutto deve essere perfetto, il lavoro, le gite nella lussuosa barca che possiede, le feste che organizza per gli amici; ogni minima smagliatura prelude alla catastrofe, ma perché? Perché - è la risposta che costruiamo insieme - l'imperfezione attiva emozioni e proprio queste, come già accennavo, non sono gestibili, manca cioè a bordo una squadra per gestire e riparare le emergenze e i venti o le ondate emotive che sono generati. La fatica che Guglielmo fa affinché tutto sia perfetto è veramente immane, ma è nulla rispetto a quella che si troverebbe a fare se nuove e impreviste emozioni dovessero attivarsi.”

Psychology
Book:Evitare le emozioni, vivere le emozioni
Create image

“When studies using mental ability test scores from children are considered, the heritability of mental ability is typically found to be about .40, and the effect of the common or shared environment is found to be almost as strong, about .35. In contrast, when studies using mental ability test scores from adults (or older adolescents) are considered, estimates of the heritability of mental ability are much higher, typically about .65, whereas estimates of common or shared environment effects are much lower, probably under .20 (see review by Haworth et al., 2010). These findings indicate that differences among children in their levels of mental ability are attributable almost as much to their common environment—that is, to features of their family or household circumstances—as to their genetic inheritances. However, the findings also suggest that as children grow up, the differences among them in mental ability become less strongly related to the features of their common environments, and more strongly related to their genetic inheritances. In other words, the effect on one's mental ability of the family or household in which one is reared tends to become less important as one grows up, so that by adulthood one's level of mental ability is heavily dependent on one's genetic characteristics. It is as if one's level of mental ability—relative to that of other persons of the same age—can be raised (or lowered) during childhood by a particularly good (or poor) home environment, but then gradually returns to the level that one's genes tend to produce.”

PsychologyIntelligenceIqPsychometricsMental AbilityPersonality DifferencesPersonality Psychology
Book:Individual Differences and Personality
Create image

“One recent case highlighted by Dan Simons relates again to the work of Yale psychologist John Bargh. In 2012, Bargh and colleague Idit Shalev published a study claiming that lonelier people prefer warmer baths and showers, thereby compensating for a lack of “social warmth” through physical warmth.44 In 2014, psychologist Brent Donnellan and colleagues reported a failure to replicate this finding—and not just in a single experiment but across nine experiments and more than 3,000 participants, over 30 times the sample size of the original study.45 Despite this failure to replicate, as well as the presence of unexplained anomalies in the original data, Bargh and Shalev refused to retract their original paper. In many other sciences, a false discovery of this magnitude would automatically trigger excision of the original work from the scientific record. In psychology, unreliability is business as usual.”

PsychologyReplicationScientific Methodology
Book:The Seven Deadly Sins of Psychology: A Manifesto for Reforming the Culture of Scientific Practice
Create image

“Schnall’s strong reaction to the failed replication of her own work provoked a mixed reaction from the psychological community. While many psychologists were bewildered by her response, a number of prominent US psychologists voiced support for her position. Dan Gilbert from Harvard University likened Schnall’s battle to the plight of Rosa Parks, and he referred to some psychologists who conducted or supported replications as “bullies,” “replication police,” “second stringers,” McCarthyists, and “god’s chosen soldiers in a great jihad.” Others accused the so-called replicators of being “Nazis,” “fascists,” and “mafia.” Rather than viewing replication as an intrinsic part of best scientific practice, Gilbert and his supporters framed it as a threat to the reputation of the (presumably brilliant) researchers who publish irreproducible findings, stifling their creativity and innovation”

PsychologyReplication Crisis
Book:The Seven Deadly Sins of Psychology: A Manifesto for Reforming the Culture of Scientific Practice
Create image