“Suppose that we agree that the two atrocities can or may be mentioned in the same breath. Why should we do so? I wrote at the time (The Nation, October 5, 1998) that Osama bin Laden 'hopes to bring a "judgmental" monotheism of his own to bear on these United States.' Chomsky's recent version of this is 'considering the grievances expressed by people of the Middle East region.' In my version, then as now, one confronts an enemy who wishes ill to our society, and also to his own (if impermeable religious despotism is considered an 'ill'). In Chomsky's reading, one must learn to sift through the inevitable propaganda and emotion resulting from the September 11 attacks, and lend an ear to the suppressed and distorted cry for help that comes, not from the victims, but from the perpetrators. I have already said how distasteful I find this attitude. I wonder if even Chomsky would now like to have some of his own words back? Why else should he take such care to quote himself deploring the atrocity? Nobody accused him of not doing so. It's often a bad sign when people defend themselves against charges which haven't been made.”
Quote by Christopher Hitchens
Work
Christopher Hitchens and His Critics: Terror, Iraq, and the Left
This book delves into the intellectual debate surrounding Christopher Hitchens' perspectives on key contemporary issues, analyzing the responses and counterarguments from various critics. more
Author
You May Also Like
Source: When a Crocodile Eats the Sun: A Memoir of Africa
Source: Roots of a Revolution: Scenes from Zimbabwe's Struggle
Source: These Bones Will Rise Again
Source: The Mud Hut I Grew Upon
Source: The Mud Hut I Grew Upon
Source: The Mud Hut I Grew Upon
Source: The Mud Hut I Grew Upon
Source: The Mud Hut I Grew Upon
Source: The Book of Memory
