“The two board games that best approximate the strategies of war are chess and the Asian game of go. In chess, the board is small. In comparison to go, the attack comes relatively quickly, forcing a decisive battle.... Go is much less formal. It is played on a large grid, with 361 intersections — nearly six times as many positions as in chess.... [A game of go] can last up to three hundred moves. The strategy is more subtle and fluid than chess, developing slowly; the more complex the pattern your stones initially create on the board, the harder it is for your opponent to understand your strategy. Fighting to control a particular area is not worth the trouble: You have to think in larger terms, to be prepared to sacrifice an area in order eventually to dominate the board. What you are after is not an entrenched position but mobility. With mobility you can isolate your opponent in small areas and then encircle them... Chess is linear, position oriented, and aggressive; go is nonlinear and fluid. Aggression is indirect until the end of the game, when the winner can surround the opponents' stones at an accelerated pace.”
Quote by Robert Greene
Book:The 48 Laws Of Power
Work
The 48 Laws Of Power
This book offers a collection of strategies and tactics for gaining and wielding power, drawing on historical examples and philosophical insights. more
Author
You May Also Like
Source: Slow Church: Cultivating Community in the Patient Way of Jesus
Source: Out of Sorts: Making Peace with an Evolving Faith
Source: 666: Connection with Crowley
Source: Energy and Equity
“I told myself I could walk away. I just didn’t realize how much of me would stay with you.”
Source: After Theory
Source: Talent Economics: The Fine Line Between Winning and Losing the Global War for Talent
Source: Dealing in Desire: Asian Ascendancy, Western Decline, and the Hidden Currencies of Global Sex Work
