Quotessence
Home / Quotes / Quote by François Lelord

Quote by François Lelord

“Or rather, he was sad because that morning he'd understood that he'd understood nothing, because while he still understood nothing he wasn't sad at all, but now that he'd understood that he'd understood nothing he felt sad, if you follow.”

Quote by François Lelord

Book:Hector and the Search for Happiness
Create image

Work

Hector and the Search for Happiness

This book follows the journey of Hector, a man who embarks on a global adventure to find the true meaning of happiness. Throughout his travels, he encounters various cultures, people, and experiences that challenge his preconceived notions about joy and success. more

Author

François Lelord

French author born on June 22, 1953, known for his detective novel series 'Dr. Benoite'. more

You May Also Like

“What feminists refer to as microaggressions, the rest of us sane adults call life....The concept of microaggressions encourages women to think that every single thing in the world is, or should be, about them. It encourages breathless levels of narcissism, solipsism and just plain delusion....Feminism encourages women to believe that they have the same reasoning and coping abilities as toddlers. No thanks.”

LifeInspirationalWomenFeminismStrengthLogicGenderWomanReasoningAnti Feminism
Author:Janet Bloomfield
Create image

“Technology, like art, is a soaring exercise of the human imagination. Art is the aesthetic ordering of experience to express meanings in symbolic terms, and the reordering of nature--the qualities of space and time--in new perceptual and material form. Art is an end in itself; its values are intrinsic. Technology is the instrumental ordering of human experience within a logic of efficient means, and the direction of nature to use its powers for material gain. But art and technology are not separate realms walled off from each other. Art employs techne, but for its own ends. Techne, too, is a form of art that bridges culture and social structure, and in the process reshapes both.”

HumansArtCultureNatureTechnologyLogic
Book:The Winding Passage : Essays and Sociological Journeys, 1960-1980
Create image

“What, then, should you do? With an excellent hand, you should bet: You lose nothing if your opponent folds, while giving yourself a good chance of winning a big pot if he calls. But with a middling hand, you shouldn't bet: If he has a bad hand, he'll fold, and you'll win the ante, which is what you'd have won anyway by checking; but if he has a good hand, he'll call and win. It's heads he wins, tails you don't. You should check instead, and hope your middling hand wins the ante. What about with a terrible hand? Should you check or bet? The answer is surprising. Checking would be unwise, because the hands will be compared and you will lose. It actually makes more sense to bet with these bad hands, because the only way he might drop out is if you make a bet. Perversely, you are better off betting with awful cards than with mediocre ones, the quintessential (and rational) bluff. There's a second reason for you to bet with terrible cards rather than middling ones: Your opponent will have to call a little more often. Because he knows that your bets are sometimes very weak, he can't afford to fold too easily. That means that when you bet with a good hand, you are more likely to be called, and to win when you are. Because you are bluffing with bad cards, your good hands make more money.”

EconomicsLogicPokerBluffing
Book:The Logic of Life: The Rational Economics of an Irrational World
Create image