“But the increasing independence of women provided a direct threat to the maintenance of male power and privilege. That no such threat did materialise, it will be argued here, owes a great deal to the success of the sexual revolution. The sexual revolution was a counter-revolution and constituted a timely adjustment to the fine-tuning of the heterosexual institution. [...] . Sex was constructed to be the new binding ingredient in marriage which would compensate for the decreased efficiency of legal and economic constraints. The 1960s was a new time of crisis for male supremacy and a new adjustment had to be made.” 1960sSexologyFeminist CritiqueSex Revolution Book:Anticlimax: a feminist perspective on the sexual revolution Source: Anticlimax: a feminist perspective on the sexual revolution
“Whatever one thinks of the feminist critique in particular, it underscores an important general lesson. For those who feel and are marginalized, the idea of a single national will, to be somehow revealed in a special election, is likely to be threatening. It deemphasizes—many would say silences—those in a minority who have competing [political or ideological] orientations. This point is reinforced by the fact that different groups and individuals do have diverse conceptions of the good life. To assume without doubt that a system of political interaction culminates in some unitary expression of national will to which the government must be "accountable" is to fail to grapple with the underlying societal complexity.” 1993Will Of The PeopleGovernment AccountabilityMinority ViewsFeminist CritiquePolitical Pluralism Book:The Limits of the Parliamentary Critique of the Separation of Powers Source: The Limits of the Parliamentary Critique of the Separation of Powers