Quotessence
Home / Quotes / Quote by Richard Lindzen

Quote by Richard Lindzen

“Under true peer-review...a panel of reviewers must accept a study before it can be published in a scientific journal. If the reviewers have objections the author must answer them or change the article to take reviewers' objections into account. Under the IPCC review process, the authors are at liberty to ignore criticisms.”

Quote by Richard Lindzen

Author

Richard Lindzen
Richard Lindzen

Richard Lindzen, born on February 8, 1940, is a renowned physicist specializing in atmospheric science. He has made significant contributions to the understanding of the physical mechanisms of climate change, particularly focusing on the impact of clouds on the climate. Professor Lindzen has been a faculty member at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where he has published numerous papers in international academic journals. more

You May Also Like

“But more than 15 sections in Chapter 8 of the report-the key chapter setting out the scientific evidence for and against a human influence over the climate-were changed or deleted after the scientist charged with examining this question had accepted the supposedly final text.”

“We have embarked globally on a path of unsustainable development. Our lifestyles, the way we produce goods and services, are all part of a system that is completely unsustainable. I see solutions to climate change leading to a much larger philosophical shift in the way human society develops. We need a new matrix to define what human progress is.”

“...99% of the casualties linked to climate change occur in developing countries. Worst hit are the world's poorest groups. While climate change will increasingly affect wealthy countries, the brunt of the impact is being borne by the poor, whose plight simply receives less attention.”

“In my more than 60 years as a member of the American scientific community, including service as president of both the National Academy of Sciences and the American Physical Society, I have never witnessed a more disturbing corruption of the peer-review process than the events that led to this IPCC report.”