Quotessence
Home / Quotes / Quote by Vandana Yadav

Quote by Vandana Yadav

“पापा का देर रात तक रेडियो पर 'हवामहल' सुनना मुझे याद है। रात के आर जे की बातों पर हम सबका हँसना, उन रातों की रौनक बढ़ा देता था। ऐसी ही एक रात को एमरजेंसी के बाद चुनाव परिणाम घोषित हुए थे। निर्णायक परिणाम आ चुका था। इंदिरा गाँधी चुनाव हार गई थी और इस घोषणा के साथ रेडियो ने गाना बजाया, 'सबेरे वाली गाड़ी से चले जाएंगे, कुछ ले के जाएंगे, कुछ दे के जाएंगे, सवेरे वाली गाड़ी...”

Quote by Vandana Yadav

Book:आई डोन्ट लाइक यू
Create image

Work

आई डोन्ट लाइक यू

Browse quotes and source details for this work. more

Author

Vandana Yadav

Browse famous quotes and profile details for Vandana Yadav. more

You May Also Like

“India needs a progressive leader to represent her locally as well as internationally.She needs a dignified ,vociferous statesman , to represent her, talk for her, talk about her, talk to her and bring out the best out of her. I support a progressive, hate-free government for the future of my country. Every human deserves due respect and honour for being all that he or she is, however it cannot be denied an ounce of learning (with all humility) certainly aids in building a strong nation in every aspect. For eons India is known for her ideals, her diversity , and that she cherishes freedom and equality. Now any one who she calls her leader cannot be allowed to puncture the constitutional fabric and infringe on the privileges she has enjoyed for years ,especially after independence. Fellow citizens need to rise from sleep, that apathetic stupor, to realisation of the danger that she was plunged into in the recent past ,and the imminent danger posed to the constitutional fabric, the economy of India, and the image of India. India needs to rise above the constant bickering within her walls, as the wise saying goes, a house divided within herself cannot stand. The torch of peace that we light within our walls will help us glow and light the world. Awaiting results.”

PoliticsIndiaPolitical PartiesPolitical PhilosophyIndian Politics2019 ElectionsNeeds Of IndiaProgressive Nation
Author:Henrietta Newton Martin
Create image

“Progressives did not like the antiquated thinking that saw the Constitution as a barrier to government expansion. The "living Constitution" was born. That benign-sounding phrase (coined later) was conjured up to justify changing the Constitution, without formal amendment, from a limit on power to a blank check. What was impermissible to the federal government by an earlier interpretation became permissible once the Constitution was construed as a evolving document. But by that philosophy, the Constitution is no limit on government power at all. A constitutional government that defines its own powers is a contradiction in terms.”

ConstitutionProgressivismConstitutional LawOriginalismLiving Document
Book:Your Money or Your Life: Why We Must Abolish the Income Tax
Create image

“How could those who wrote the Constitution possibly understand its meaning better than those who had the experience of observing and participating in its operation? It is one thing to rail against the evils of politically unaccountable judges enlarging constitutional rights beyond the ideas and purposes of their adopters; another to explain why morally sustainable claims of equality be held captive to the extraordinary obstacles of Article V or subject to the partial and incomplete understandings of 1789 or 1868.”

U S ConstitutionOriginalismOriginal Meaning
Book:Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution
Create image

“It is in no way remarkable, and in no way a vindication of textual evolutionism, that taking power from the people and placing it instead with a judicial aristocracy can produce some creditable results that democracy might not achieve. The same can be said of monarchy and totalitarianism. But once a nation has decided that democracy, with all its warts, is the best system of government, the crucial question becomes which theory of textual interpretation is compatible with democracy. Originalism unquestionably is. Nonoriginalism, by contrast, imposes on society statutory prescriptions that were never democratically adopted.”

Originalism
Book:Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
Create image

“The Court’s insistence that judges and lawyers rely nearly exclusively on history to interpret the Second Amendment thus raises a host of troubling questions. Consider, for example, the following. Do lower courts have the research resources necessary to conduct exhaustive historical analyses in every Second Amendment case? What historical regulations and decisions qualify as representative analogues to modern laws? How will judges determine which historians have the better view of close historical questions? Will the meaning of the Second Amendment change if or when new historical evidence becomes available? And, most importantly, will the Court’s approach permit judges to reach the outcomes they prefer and then cloak those outcomes in the language of history?”

Supreme Court2022Originalism
Book:New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen
Create image