Quotessence
Home / Quotes / Quote by Daniel Prokop

Quote by Daniel Prokop

Work

Leaving Neverland: Why Little Boys Shouldn't Run Big Corporations

Browse quotes and source details for this work. more

Author

Daniel Prokop

Browse famous quotes and profile details for Daniel Prokop. more

You May Also Like

“When the management iceberg is shaped like a huge phallus, you know that there are a lot of tossers that the top penguin has had to climb over to reach the tip and that there is no shortage of the same caliber of penguin in the balls and shaft of the corporation, just waiting for their chance to get a spurt to the top. Should I sugar coat this a little more? or tell it like it is?”

InspirationalHumorManagementEmotional IntelligenceRites Of PassageLeaving NeverlandDaniel ProkopManagement Structures
Book:Leaving Neverland: Why Little Boys Shouldn't Run Big Corporations
Create image

“When two or three people come together in the name of Neverland then I will be there amidst them or if I am too busy or have a better offer, then I will send a proxy or you can just have the tantrum without me, whatever.” (King James Version: Gospel of St. Peter (of Pan)Verse: Blah Paragraph: Blah, blah”

HumorPeter PanLeaving NeverlandDaniel Prokop
Book:Leaving Neverland: Why Little Boys Shouldn't Run Big Corporations
Create image

“But . . . but was evil an entity at all? What caused evil? Imperfection in activity . . . imperfection of matter. It could not stand alone. It could not exist by itself. It had to use a pre-existing Good. It was an imperfection of the Good, a privation of the Good, a perversion of the Good. By itself? By itself . . . it was . . . nothing. By itself it had no being. It was *not* an entity. . . . Calmly Thomas began to dictate to Briancourt a sequence of thoughts which tore Evil from its throne of being an entity, a principle in its own right, and relegated it to the status of a parasite.”

MoralityGood And EvilThomas Aquinas
Author:De Wohl, Louis
Create image

“Part of the problem with Dawkins’s criticisms of Aquinas, then (and of the other New Atheists’ criticisms of certain other religious arguments), is that they fail to understand the difference between a scientific hypothesis and an attempted metaphysical demonstration, and illegitimately judge the latter as if it were the former. Of course, they might respond by claiming that scientific reasoning, and maybe mathematical reasoning too, are the only legitimate kinds, and seek thereby to rule out metaphysical arguments from the get go. But there are two problems with this view (which is known as “scientism” or “positivism”). First, if they want to take this position, they’ll need to defend it and not simply assert it; otherwise they’ll be begging the question against their opponents and indulging in just the sort of dogmatism they claim to oppose. Second, the moment they attempt to defend it, they will have effectively refuted it, for scientism or positivism is itself a metaphysical position that could only be justified using metaphysical arguments.”

ReligionAtheismReasoningMetaphysicsScientismThomas AquinasAquinas
Book:The Last Superstition: A Refutation of the New Atheism
Create image