“The "omnivore's dilemma" (a term coined by Paul Rozin) is that omnivores must seek out and explore new potential foods while remaining wary of them until they are proven safe. Omnivores therefore go through life with two competing motives: neophilia (an attraction to new things) and neophobia (a fear of new things). People vary in terms of which motive is stronger, and this variation will come back to help us in later chapters: Liberals score higher on measures of neophilia (also known as "openness to experience"), not just for new foods but also for new people, music, and ideas. Conservatives are higher on neophobia; they prefer to stick with what's tried and true, and they care a lot more about guarding borders, boundaries, and traditions.”
Quote by Jonathan Haidt
Work
The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion
This book delves into the cognitive and emotional processes that drive political and religious beliefs, analyzing how these beliefs can lead to division among individuals who share similar moral values. It investigates the psychological mechanisms that contribute to the formation of these beliefs and the ways in which they can be reconciled or understood across different perspectives. more
Author
You May Also Like
Source: The Light in the Heart
Source: The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion
Source: Saving Jesus from the Church: How to Stop Worshiping Christ and Start Following Jesus
Source: Dexter's Final Cut
“Being opposed to progress has always been the wrong side of history.”
Source: Inside The Mind of an Introvert
