Quotessence
Home / Quotes / Quote by Daniel Ruczko

Quote by Daniel Ruczko

“In einer Zeit, in der wir ständig mit massenproduzierten Inhalten bombardiert werden, die darauf ausgelegt sind, konsumiert und gleich wieder vergessen zu werden, wie beschissenes Fast Food für den Geist, entscheidest du dich für das Gourmet-Dinner und schreibst Bücher.”

Quote by Daniel Ruczko

Book:Scherben einer zerbrochenen Seele
Create image

Work

Scherben einer zerbrochenen Seele

Browse quotes and source details for this work. more

Author

Daniel Ruczko

Browse famous quotes and profile details for Daniel Ruczko. more

You May Also Like

“I also need you to "spread the word," quietly, that if any harm should come to Antanasia during my imprisonment, I will not only tear down these walls stone by stone, but -- once freed -- shatter the rule of law and destroy, with great satisfaction, anyone who arouses in me even the slightest suspicion. Indeed, if so much as one hair on my wife's head is disturbed while I cannot protect her, this kingdom will see retribution that will go down in the history books -- to be read by the very few who remain standing. - Lucius”

Lucius
Book:Jessica Rules the Dark Side
Create image

“Much of our food system depends on our not knowing much about it, beyond the price disclosed by the checkout scanner; cheapness and ignorance are mutually reinforcing. And it's a short way from not knowing who's at the other end of your food chain to not caring–to the carelessness of both producers and consumers that characterizes our economy today. Of course, the global economy couldn't very well function without this wall of ignorance and the indifference it breeds. This is why the American food industry and its international counterparts fight to keep their products from telling even the simplest stories–"dolphin safe," "humanely slaughtered," etc.–about how they were produced. The more knowledge people have about the way their food is produced, the more likely it is that their values–and not just "value"–will inform their purchasing decisions.”

IgnoranceIndustryProductDilemmaAmericanFood ChainFood SafetyMichaelPurchaseOmnivoreFood RegulationMichael Pollan Omnivore DilemmaPollan
Book:The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
Create image

“The question of chemical residues on the food we eat is a hotly debated issue. The existence of such residues is either played down by the industry as unimportant or is flatly denied. Simultaneously, there is a strong tendency to brand as fanatics or cultists all who are so perverse as to demand that their food be free of insect poisons. In all this cloud of controversy, what are the actual facts?”

EnvironmentalismFood SafetyInsecticides
Book:Silent Spring
Create image

“Continuing to do research on genetic modification, and occasionally using successfully modified organisms for specific purposes such as the production of expensive drugs, make good sense. Helping developing countries to produce more food is a worthy aim, but it is sometimes used as an excuse for an alternative agenda, or as a convenient way to demonise opponents. There is little doubt that the technology needs better regulation: I find it bizarre that standard food safety tests are not required, on the grounds that the plants have not been changed in any significant way, but that the innovations are so great that they deserve patent protection, contrary to the long-standing view that naturally occurring objects and substances cannot be patented. Either it’s new, and needs testing like anything else, or it’s not, and should not be patentable. It is also disturbing, in an age when commercial sponsors blazon their logos across athletes’ shirts and television screens, that the biotechnology industry has fought a lengthy political campaign to prevent any mention of their product being placed on food. The reason is clear enough: to avoid any danger of a consumer boycott. But consumers are effectively being force-fed products that they may not want, and whose presence is being concealed. Our current understanding of genetics and ecology is inadequate when it comes to the widespread use of genetically modified organisms in the natural environment or agriculture. Why take the risk of distributing the material, when the likely gains for most of us – as opposed to short-term profits for biotechnology companies – are tiny or non-existent?”

EcologyPatentsLack Of UnderstandingFood SafetyGmoGetentics
Author:Ian Stewart
Create image