Quotessence
Home / Books / Christopher Hitchens and His Critics: Terror, Iraq, and the Left

Christopher Hitchens and His Critics: Terror, Iraq, and the Left

Book by Christopher Hitchens · 4 quotes · Leftism, Terrorism, United States

Filter quotes by topic

AllLeftismTerrorismUnited StatesWarWar On TerrorIraq WarBill ClintonGeorge W BushIfsIslamReligionAntiwar MovementJihadLiberalismPoliticsSaddamSaddam HusseinSeptember 11 AttacksTalibanThinking

Christopher Hitchens and His Critics: Terror, Iraq, and the Left Quotes

“George Bush made a mistake when he referred to the Saddam Hussein regime as 'evil.' Every liberal and leftist knows how to titter at such black-and-white moral absolutism. What the president should have done, in the unlikely event that he wanted the support of America's peace-mongers, was to describe a confrontation with Saddam as the 'lesser evil.' This is a term the Left can appreciate. Indeed, 'lesser evil' is part of the essential tactical rhetoric of today's Left, and has been deployed to excuse or overlook the sins of liberal Democrats, from President Clinton's bombing of Sudan to Madeleine Albright's veto of an international rescue for Rwanda when she was U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. Among those longing for nuance, moral relativism—the willingness to use the term evil, when combined with a willingness to make accommodations with it—is the smart thing: so much more sophisticated than 'cowboy' language.”

EvilUnited StatesMoralityIraqLiberalismAnti WarUnited NationsIraq WarRwandaLeftismSudanAbsolutismPeace MovementMoral RelativismBill ClintonGeorge W BushSaddam HusseinRwandan GenocideDemocratic Party United StatesMoral AbsolutismBa Ath PartyMadeleine AlbrightOpposition To The Iraq WarPresidency Of Bill ClintonAl Shifa Pharmaceutical FactoryPresidency Of George W Bush
Book:Christopher Hitchens and His Critics: Terror, Iraq, and the Left
Create image

“As to the 'Left' I'll say briefly why this was the finish for me. Here is American society, attacked under open skies in broad daylight by the most reactionary and vicious force in the contemporary world, a force which treats Afghans and Algerians and Egyptians far worse than it has yet been able to treat us. The vaunted CIA and FBI are asleep, at best. The working-class heroes move, without orders and at risk to their lives, to fill the moral and political vacuum. The moral idiots, meanwhile, like Falwell and Robertson and Rabbi Lapin, announce that this clerical aggression is a punishment for our secularism. And the governments of Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, hitherto considered allies on our 'national security' calculus, prove to be the most friendly to the Taliban and Al Qaeda. Here was a time for the Left to demand a top-to-bottom house-cleaning of the state and of our covert alliances, a full inquiry into the origins of the defeat, and a resolute declaration in favor of a fight to the end for secular and humanist values: a fight which would make friends of the democratic and secular forces in the Muslim world. And instead, the near-majority of 'Left' intellectuals started sounding like Falwell, and bleating that the main problem was Bush's legitimacy. So I don't even muster a hollow laugh when this pathetic faction says that I, and not they, are in bed with the forces of reaction.”

DemocracyIslamHumanismTerrorismAfghanistanWorking ClassEgyptNational SecurityPakistanSecularismAl QaedaTalibanSaudi ArabiaJihadLeftismAlgeriaIslamismGeorge W BushSeptember 11 AttacksCentral Intelligence AgencyPat RobertsonJerry FalwellFederal Bureau Of InvestigationDaniel Lapin
Book:Christopher Hitchens and His Critics: Terror, Iraq, and the Left
Create image

“You might think that the Left could have a regime-change perspective of its own, based on solidarity with its comrades abroad. After all, Saddam's ruling Ba'ath Party consolidated its power by first destroying the Iraqi communist and labor movements, and then turning on the Kurds (whose cause, historically, has been one of the main priorities of the Left in the Middle East). When I first became a socialist, the imperative of international solidarity was the essential if not the defining thing, whether the cause was popular or risky or not. I haven't seen an anti-war meeting all this year at which you could even guess at the existence of the Iraqi and Kurdish opposition to Saddam, an opposition that was fighting for 'regime change' when both Republicans and Democrats were fawning over Baghdad as a profitable client and geopolitical ally. Not only does the 'peace' movement ignore the anti-Saddam civilian opposition, it sends missions to console the Ba'athists in their isolation, and speaks of the invader of Kuwait and Iran and the butcher of Kurdistan as if he were the victim and George W. Bush the aggressor.”

IraqSocialismCommunismAnti WarMiddle EastIraq WarBaghdadLeftismKuwaitPeace MovementLabour MovementGeorge W BushSaddam HusseinRepublican Party United StatesDemocratic Party United StatesKurdish PeopleBa Ath PartyIran Iraq WarIraqi KurdistanOpposition To The Iraq WarInvasion Of KuwaitAl Anfal CampaignIraqi Communist Party
Book:Christopher Hitchens and His Critics: Terror, Iraq, and the Left
Create image

“The President is also captured in a well-worn TV news clip, making a boilerplate response to a question on terrorism and then asking the reporters to watch his drive. Well, that's what you get if you catch the President on a golf course. If Eisenhower had done this, as he often did, it would have been presented as calm statesmanship. If Clinton had done it, as he often did, it would have shown his charm.”

United StatesTelevisionGolfTerrorismCharmHypocrisyWar On TerrorDouble StandardsStatesmanshipBill ClintonGeorge W BushDwight D Eisenhower
Book:Christopher Hitchens and His Critics: Terror, Iraq, and the Left
Create image