Quotessence
Home / Books / Christopher Hitchens and His Critics: Terror, Iraq, and the Left

Christopher Hitchens and His Critics: Terror, Iraq, and the Left

Book by Christopher Hitchens · 4 quotes · Leftism, Terrorism, United States

Filter quotes by topic

AllLeftismTerrorismUnited StatesWarWar On TerrorIraq WarBill ClintonGeorge W BushIfsIslamReligionAntiwar MovementJihadLiberalismPoliticsSaddamSaddam HusseinSeptember 11 AttacksTalibanThinking

Christopher Hitchens and His Critics: Terror, Iraq, and the Left Quotes

“The neo-cons, or some of them, decided that they would back Clinton when he belatedly decided for Bosnia and Kosovo against Milosevic, and this even though they loathed Clinton, because the battle against religious and ethnic dictatorship in the Balkans took precedence. This, by the way, was partly a battle to save Muslims from Catholic and Christian Orthodox killers. That impressed me. The neo-cons also took the view, quite early on, that coexistence with Saddam Hussein was impossible as well as undesirable. They were dead right about that. They had furthermore been thinking about the menace of jihadism when most people were half-asleep. And then I have to say that I was rather struck by the way that the Weekly Standard and its associated voices took the decision to get rid of Trent Lott earlier this year, thus removing an embarrassment as well as a disgrace from the political scene. And their arguments were on points of principle, not 'perception.' I liked their ruthlessness here, and their seriousness, at a time when much of the liberal Left is not even seriously wrong, but frivolously wrong, and babbles without any sense of responsibility. (I mean, have you read their sub-Brechtian stuff on Halliburton....?) And revolution from above, in some states and cases, is—as I wrote in my book A Long Short War—often preferable to the status quo, or to no revolution at all.”

WarReligionPoliticsChristianityRevolutionIslamLiberalismCatholicismDictatorshipPersecutionEthnicityJihadLeftismBosniaKosovoBalkansBosnian WarBill ClintonSaddam HusseinBertolt BrechtNeoconservatismKosovo WarSlobodan MilosevicA Long Short WarHalliburtonPersecution Of MuslimsThe Weekly StandardTrent Lott
Book:Christopher Hitchens and His Critics: Terror, Iraq, and the Left
Create image

“Suppose that we agree that the two atrocities can or may be mentioned in the same breath. Why should we do so? I wrote at the time (The Nation, October 5, 1998) that Osama bin Laden 'hopes to bring a "judgmental" monotheism of his own to bear on these United States.' Chomsky's recent version of this is 'considering the grievances expressed by people of the Middle East region.' In my version, then as now, one confronts an enemy who wishes ill to our society, and also to his own (if impermeable religious despotism is considered an 'ill'). In Chomsky's reading, one must learn to sift through the inevitable propaganda and emotion resulting from the September 11 attacks, and lend an ear to the suppressed and distorted cry for help that comes, not from the victims, but from the perpetrators. I have already said how distasteful I find this attitude. I wonder if even Chomsky would now like to have some of his own words back? Why else should he take such care to quote himself deploring the atrocity? Nobody accused him of not doing so. It's often a bad sign when people defend themselves against charges which haven't been made.”

WarReligionEmotionUnited StatesIslamTerrorismPropagandaMiddle EastDespotismOsama Bin LadenWar CrimesMonotheismTheocracyIslamic TerrorismSeptember 11 AttacksNoam Chomsky1998The NationAl Shifa Pharmaceutical Factory
Book:Christopher Hitchens and His Critics: Terror, Iraq, and the Left
Create image