Quotessence
Home / Books / Animal liberation: a new ethics for our treatment of animals

Animal liberation: a new ethics for our treatment of animals

Book by Peter Singer · 5 quotes · Animal, Animal Liberation, Humans

Filter quotes by topic

AllAnimalAnimal LiberationHumansLiberationIfsCrueltyAnimal RightsExperimentsPeopleSpeciesSufferingAnimal CrueltyConditionsDogGovernmentHas BeensHuman BeingsInfantInterestMight

Animal liberation: a new ethics for our treatment of animals Quotes

“Habits of thought lead us to brush aside descriptions of cruelty to animals as emotional, for "animal-lovers only"; or if not that, then anyway the problem is so trivial in comparison to the problems of human beings that no sensible person could give it time and attention. This too is a prejudice - for how can one know that a problem is trivial until one has taken the time to examine its extent?”

IfsKnowsGivingHumansPersonsProblemHuman BeingsAnimalAttentionTakenEmotionalHabitLoversPrejudiceCrueltyLiberationDescriptionComparisonSensibleBrushesAnimal CrueltyAnimal LiberationAnimal Lover
Book:Animal liberation: a new ethics for our treatment of animals
Create image

“The statement "I am in pain" may be one piece of evidence for the conclusion that the speaker is in pain, but it is not the only possible evidence, and since people sometimes tell lies, not even the best possible evidence. Even if there were stronger grounds for refusing to attribute pain to those who do not have language, the consequences of this refusal might lead us to reject the conclusion. Human infants and young children are unable to use language. Are we to deny that a year-old child can suffer?”

PeopleIfsYearsHumansMayChildrenSometimesUseMightPainYoungLyingSufferingLanguageAnimalPiecesEvidenceConsequenceStrongerDenyStatementsConclusionLiberationRejectsAttributesSpeakersInfantRefusalYoung ChildrenOne PieceAnimal Liberation
Book:Animal liberation: a new ethics for our treatment of animals
Create image

“So far as this argument is concerned nonhuman animals and infants and retarded humans are in the same category; and if we use this argument to justify experiments on nonhuman animals we have to ask ourselves whether we are also prepared to allow experiments on human infants and retarded adults; and if we make a distinction between animals and these humans, on what basis can we do it, other than a bare-faced - and morally indefensible - preference for members of our own species?”

IfsHumansUseAsksAnimalMembersAdultsConcernedArgumentBasesPreparedSpeciesExperimentsLiberationDistinctionJustifyCategoriesPreferenceInfantRetardedAnimal Liberation
Book:Animal liberation: a new ethics for our treatment of animals
Create image