Home / Quotes / Quote by Jonathan Safran Foer

Quote by Jonathan Safran Foer

“You need to have a reader's sympathy in order to accomplish anything. It's like at a reading, I find it's better to read something funny than to read something tragic. It just goes over better because you have a finite amount of time with somebody. Of course, in a book, you have a lot of time. But you still do want to make a certain impression right when you begin.”

Quote by Jonathan Safran Foer

Author

Jonathan Safran Foer

Jonathan Safran Foer is an American writer known for his unique narrative style and profound insights into social issues. His works often blend historical, literary, and philosophical elements, exploring themes such as family, memory, and identity. more

You May Also Like

“Art can be very political but that can't be the purpose of art, it can't be the driving force. It isn't with any of the books that I love, anyway.”

Art Book Political Purpose Force Driving Driving Force Purpose Of Art

Author:Jonathan Safran Foer

“Just to be a functioning adult in the world, we develop all of these layers of protection. When we see homeless people, we don't cry, even though homeless people probably deserve our tears - you know, it's a horrible thing.”

People Knows World Cry Tears Adults Deserve Protection Horrible Layers Homeless Horrible Things Homeless People

Author:Jonathan Safran Foer

“September 11 had such a strong visual component, the most visually documented event in human history. Nothing's ever been seen by as many people as that was. Our experiences of the day, our memories of the day are just so tied up in images of buildings falling and bodies falling.”

People Humans Body Fall Strong Memories Events Building Visuals Tied September Components Human History Our Memories September 11 Tied Up

Author:Jonathan Safran Foer

“It turns out that we're actually capable of something other than neoliberalism and actually we're really capable of enjoying ourselves more than we do under neoliberalism. It feels that if neoliberalism is first about privatizing desire and imagination before the economy, then we're in this process of publicizing it again.”

Ifs Feels Firsts Desire Turns Process Enjoy Imagination Economy Capable Neoliberalism

Author:Rebecca Solnit

“I often think that the reason capitalism hasn't completely destroyed everything is that a huge amount of anti-capitalist endeavor goes on, from labors of love, nurture, friendship, and barter to gift economies and different kinds of exchanges, not just one alternate model but a whole host of other ways in which we engage with each other and with the world that aren't financial and debt-based.”

“The oil corporations spend a lot of money to get, say, the tar sands pipeline through, but nobody's - you know, there are definitely environmentalists being paid - but a lot of people are acting for something other than financial compensation. So if the tar sands pipeline doesn't get made, it's because a huge amount of people are doing something that doesn't involve remuneration, money, etc., because we're not actually the self-interested financial instruments that economists like to imagine we are.”

“I am against resources being controlled by corporations, but that doesn't mean I want them controlled by the state.”

Want Mean States Resources Corporations Controlled

Author:Rebecca Solnit

“If you look at a lot of traditional societies, they're all organized along what we might call anarchist guidelines, but it's not like the Zapatistas were reading European social theory.”

Ifs Looks Might Reading Social Theory Traditional Organized Anarchist Guidelines Social Theory

Author:Rebecca Solnit

“That's what I'm trying to get over: the idea that anarchism offers a description of equitable relations that go way back rather than a hypothesis of what the future should look like.”

Way Should Trying Looks Ideas Offers Relation Description Get Over Hypothesis Anarchism Equitable

Author:Rebecca Solnit

“There was an assumption that aerial bombing of civilians in World War II would cause fragile, working-class people to basically have nervous breakdowns and it would paralyze the state. That was the logic of aerial bombing. In fact, it doesn't happen at all, but the logic behind aerial bombing has never stopped, even though it never demoralizes, terrorizes, or paralyzes a population.”