“How was confounding defined then, and how should it be defined? Armed with what we now know about the logic of causality, the answer to the second question is easier. The quantity we observe is the conditional probability of the outcome given the treatment, P(Y | X). The question we want to ask of Nature has to do with the causal relationship between X and Y, which is captured by the interventional probability P( Y | do(X)). Confounding, then, should simply be defined as anything that leads to a discrepancy between the two: P(Y | X) != P(Y | do(X)). Why all the fuss.”
Quote by Judea Pearl
Work
The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect
Browse quotes and source details for this work. more
Author
You May Also Like
Source: The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark
Source: THE RIGHT OF AUTHORS TO USE AI FREELY: Why AI Is a Tool, Not an Author
Source: Louis Pasteur Condemns Big Pharma: Vaccines, Drugs, and Healthcare in the United States
Source: Louis Pasteur Condemns Big Pharma: Vaccines, Drugs, and Healthcare in the United States
Source: Louis Pasteur Condemns Big Pharma: Vaccines, Drugs, and Healthcare in the United States