“In a pattern of misrepresentation that is repeated on other issues, Hochschild at first mentions this inconvenient fact and then proceeds to say the opposite for the entirety of the book. The fiefdom “was shared in no way with the Belgian government,” which “had no legal authority over [Léopold] as ruler of the Congo,” he alerts readers. Yet not only the subtitle of the book but laced throughout are constant smears against European colonialism.”
Quote by Bruce Gilley
Work
King Hochschild’s Hoax: An absurdly deceptive book on Congolese rubber production is better described as historical fiction.
Browse quotes and source details for this work. more
Author
You May Also Like
Source: King Hochschild’s Hoax: An absurdly deceptive book on Congolese rubber production is better described as historical fiction.
Source: King Hochschild’s Hoax: An absurdly deceptive book on Congolese rubber production is better described as historical fiction.
Source: The Case for Colonialism: A Response to My Critics
“Racisme is niet het gevolg van kolonialisme, kolonialisme is het gevolg van racisme.”
Source: Zwarte trots, witte schaamte? Over kolonialisme en racisme
Source: Zwarte trots, witte schaamte? Over kolonialisme en racisme
Source: The Walls of Toterrum
Source: Zwarte trots, witte schaamte? Over kolonialisme en racisme