Quotessence
Home / Authors / Peter Singer
Peter Singer

Peter Singer Quotes

Philosopher

Filter quotes by topic

AllAnimalHumansIfsThinkingAnimal LiberationPeopleLiberationShouldEthicsInterestWorldSufferingHuman BeingsNeedsGivingMayAnimal RightsChildrenEthicalSpecies

Famous Peter Singer Quotes

“The statement "I am in pain" may be one piece of evidence for the conclusion that the speaker is in pain, but it is not the only possible evidence, and since people sometimes tell lies, not even the best possible evidence. Even if there were stronger grounds for refusing to attribute pain to those who do not have language, the consequences of this refusal might lead us to reject the conclusion. Human infants and young children are unable to use language. Are we to deny that a year-old child can suffer?”

PeopleIfsYearsHumansMayChildrenSometimesUseMightPainYoungLyingSufferingLanguageAnimalPiecesEvidenceConsequenceStrongerDenyStatementsConclusionLiberationRejectsAttributesSpeakersInfantRefusalYoung ChildrenOne PieceAnimal Liberation
Book:Animal liberation: a new ethics for our treatment of animals
Create image

“Sometimes animals may suffer more because of their more limited understanding. If, for instance, we are taking prisoners in wartime we can explain to them that although they must submit to capture, search, and confinement, they will not otherwise be harmed and will be set free at the conclusion of hostilities. If we capture wild animals, however, we cannot explain that we are not threatening their lives. A wild animal cannot distinguish an attempt to overpower and confine from an attempt to kill; the one causes as much terror as the other.”

IfsMaySometimesSufferingCausesUnderstandingAnimalTerrorConclusionInstanceLiberationPrisonerCaptureSubmitThreateningHostilityWild AnimalAnimal LiberationConfinementWartime
Author:Peter Singer
Create image

“It may be thought justifiable to require tests on animals of potentially life-saving drugs, but the same kinds of tests are used for products like cosmetics, food coloring, and floor polishes. Should thousands of animals suffer so that a new kind of lipstick or floor wax can be put on the market? Don't we already have an excess of most of these products? Who benefits from their introduction, except the companies that hope to profit from them?”

ShouldKindMayUsedSufferingAnimalCompanyProductsDrugBenefitsTestsProfitSavingLiberationExcessIntroductionPolishLipstickCosmeticsAnimal LiberationLife Saving
Author:Peter Singer
Create image

“Even in the era of AIDS, sex raises no unique moral issues at all. Decisions about sex may involve considerations about honesty, concern for others, prudence, and so on, but there is nothing special about sex in this respect, for the same could be said of decisions about driving a car. (In fact, the moral issues raised by driving a car, both from an environmental and from a safety point of view, are much more serious than those raised by sex.)”

MaySaidFactsSexDecisionViewsMoralIssuesSpecialCarHonestySeriousUniqueConcernRaisesSafetyRaisedEnvironmentalPoint Of ViewAidsDrivingErasConsiderationPrudenceMoral IssuesConcern For Others
Book:Practical Ethics
Create image

“Typically, defenders of experiments on animals do not deny that animals suffer. They cannot deny the animals' suffering, because they need to stress the similarities between humans and other animals in order to claim that their experiments may have some relevance for human purposes. The experimenter who forces rats to choose between starvation and electric shock to see if they develop ulcers (which they do) does so because the rat has a nervous system very similar to a human being's, and presumably feels an electric shock in a similar way.”

IfsWayNeedsFeelsHumansMayDoePurposeSufferingOrderForceHuman BeingsAnimalClaimsStressDenyExperimentsNervousLiberationShockElectricRatsRelevanceStarvationSimilarityDefendersNervous SystemAnimal LiberationUlcersAnimal SufferingElectric ShockExperiments On Animals
Author:Peter Singer
Create image