“One of the main arguments that I make is that although almost everyone accepts that it is morally wrong to inflict “unnecessary” suffering and death on animals, 99% of the suffering and death that we inflict on animals can be justified only by our pleasure, amusement, or convenience. For example, the best justification that we have for killing the billions of nonhumans that we eat every year is that we enjoy the taste of animal flesh and animal products. This is not an acceptable justification if we take seriously, as we purport to, that it is wrong to inflict unnecessary suffering or death on animals, and it illustrates the confused thinking that I characterize as our “moral schizophrenia” when it comes to nonhumans. A follow-up question that I often get is: “What about vivisection? Surely that use of animals is not merely for our pleasure, is it?” Vivisection, Part One: The “Necessity” of Vivisection | Animal Rights: The Abolitionist Approach”
Quote by GaryLFrancione
Author
You May Also Like
Source: S.E.X.: The All-You-Need-To-Know Progressive Sexuality Guide to Get You Through High School and College
Source: 10 Years Younger in 10 Weeks
Source: House of the Tiger King : The Quest for a Lost City
Source: Fire Your Doctor! How to Be Independently Healthy
Source: Fire Your Doctor! How to Be Independently Healthy
Source: Discovering the True You with Ayurveda: How to Nourish, Rejuvenate, and Transform Your Life
Source: Healing of the Self, the Negatives: Notebooks
Source: The Plague