Best Peace Making Quotes | Short & Famous Sayings

“War is a bad bad thing, but you know what's worse - it's the silence of the civilians who don't even raise an eyebrow at the tomfoolery of the warmongers.”

Indifference World Peace Peace On Earth International Relations Peace Activist War And Peace Peace Making Nationalist Fundamentalism Warmonger Warmongering

Book:Mücadele Muhabbet: Gospel of An Unarmed Soldier

Source: Mücadele Muhabbet: Gospel of An Unarmed Soldier

“Peace happens when we happen.”

Humanitarian Indifference Accountability World Peace Peace Activist Peacemaking Humanitarian Crisis Peace Making Take A Stand

Book:Mücadele Muhabbet: Gospel of An Unarmed Soldier

Source: Mücadele Muhabbet: Gospel of An Unarmed Soldier

“Segregation is a word of the past. Unity is the key to a peaceful future.”

Source: Rise Up and Salute the Sun: The Writings of Suzy Kassem

“Calling for peace means that war is inevitable.”

War Peace Battle Inevitable Conflicts Peace Making Crash Course Too Late Quotes

Book:Svetioničar - Pomračenje

Source: Svetioničar - Pomračenje

“If you want to bring the world closer to peace, be a peacemaker by creating peace whenever you can. If you find yourself engaged in an argument that only stirs anger in the heart, quickly make peace and carry on.”

Source: Rise Up and Salute the Sun: The Writings of Suzy Kassem

“Today, spend a little time cultivating relationships offline. Never forget that everybody isn't on social media.”

Wisdom Peace Advice Perspective Wise Words Internet Social Media Online Peace Of Mind Thought Provoking Volunteer World Peace Social Change Outlook Peace Quotes Elderly Social Networking Time Passing Thoughts On Life Words To Live By Facebook Advice For Life Social Media Quotes Advice For Daily Living Germany Kent Quotes Social Media Addiction Germany Kent Peace Making Advice Quotes Germany Kent Quote Facebook Quotes Social Media Audiences Do Something Perspectives Perspective Quotes Give Back Quotes Peace Movement Perspective On Life Volunteering Social Media Advice Online Communication Cultivate Do Good Do Good Quotes Words To Ponder Love People Give Back To Society Disconnect Social Media Behavior Advice For Women Internet Addiction Thoughts And Beliefs Social Media Mind Give Back Advice To Daughter Do Better Facebook Addiction Future Present Advice For Men Outlook And Attitude Do Gooders Thoughts And Perceptions Time Passing Moments Do Good Anyway Elderly Love Advice To Beginners Do Good Power Words To The Wise Social Networking Accounts Distance Yourself Choose Your Time Wisely Cultivate Your Mind Cultivate Your Peace Facebook Acounts Perspectives Of Time Social Networking People

Author:Germany Kent

“Use social media for good and lift others up, not tear them down. Stay on the high road. Keep your peace.”

“When you are wise, peace shall follow.”

“The bond of love will unite the world.”

People World Love Believe Inspiration Faith Humanity Hope Peace Christianity Society Wise Words Unity Peaceful Working Together Peace Making Co Existence

Book:Pearls of Wisdom: Great mind

Source: Pearls of Wisdom: Great mind

“You never know what people live through. Be kind to all people.”

Source: Pearls of Wisdom: Great mind

“Peace and gladness in every home is a peace for the society, nation and the world.”

Source: Pearls of Wisdom: Great mind

“We should always be clear that animal exploitation is wrong because it involves speciesism. And speciesism is wrong because, like racism, sexism, homophobia, anti-semitism, classism, and all other forms of human discrimination, speciesism involves violence inflicted on members of the moral community where that infliction of violence cannot be morally justified. But that means that those of us who oppose speciesism necessarily oppose discrimination against humans. It makes no sense to say that speciesism is wrong because it is like racism (or any other form of discrimination) but that we do not have a position about racism. We do. We should be opposed to it and we should always be clear about that.”

“Kindness is universal. Sometimes being kind allows others to see the goodness in humanity through you. Always be kinder than necessary.”

World Motivational Inspirational Quotes Motivation Humanity Hope Peace Change Motivational Quotes Kindness Human Nature Example Inspire Universal Inspirational Attitude Helping Others Exception Helpful Be Kind Leaders Help Motivational Inspirational Nonviolence Truth Of Life World Peace Motivational Quotations Motivational Quotes For Women Giving Back Helping People Motivational Speaker Inspirational Living Peace On Earth Be The Change Humanity Quotes Lead Others Helping Hand Stand Up Universal Mind Goodness Quotes Peacemaker Make A Difference Germany Kent Quotes Universal Language Germany Kent Peace Making Change The World Quotes The Hope Guru Hope Guru Germany Kent Quote Necessary Motivational Enlightenment Help Quotes Universal Truths Be Kind To Others Be The Light Giving Love Spread Love Giving Help Inspirational Speakers Be The Change Quotes Do Good Do Good Quotes Humanity And Reality Help Others Quotes Inspirational Religious Exception To The Rule Differences Between People Non Verbal Communication Motivational Speaker Quotes Raise Your Voice Be Kind Quotes Truth Inspirational Be The Hero You Can T Find Goodness Inspirational Be The Joy Of Others Being Kind Others Quotes Difference Makers Lead From Within Be Kind To All Be Kind To Someone Be Kind Today Spreading Peace Spreading Sunshine Humanity Society Difference Maker Goodness And Evil Be The Light Quote Goodness In Life Help Others Find Happiness Inspirational Speaker Be Kinder Be The Lighthouse Goodness Strength Spread Hope Universal Truth Quotes Way Maker Be The Light Quotes Differences Of People Be The Light In Someone S Life Being Kind To Your Fellow Woman Your Life Is An Aspiring Story Answer To A Prayer Be Kind Enough Not To Get Angry Being Kind And Humble Motivation Speakers Necessary Quotes Others May Follow Transformational Speaker Your Life Is An Example

Author:Germany Kent

“I am opposed to animal welfare campaigns for two reasons. First, if animal use cannot be morally justified, then we ought to be clear about that, and advocate for no use. Although rape and child molestation are ubiquitous, we do not have campaigns for “humane” rape or “humane” child molestation. We condemn it all. We should do the same with respect to animal exploitation. Second, animal welfare reform does not provide significant protection for animal interests. Animals are chattel property; they are economic commodities. Given this status and the reality of markets, the level of protection provided by animal welfare will generally be limited to what promotes efficient exploitation. That is, we will protect animal interests to the extent that it provides an economic benefit.”

“Animals are property. There are laws that supposedly protect animal interests in being treated “humanely,” but that term is interpreted in large part to mean that we cannot impose “unnecessary” harm on animals, and that is measured by what treatment is considered as necessary within particular industries, and according to customs of use, to exploit animals. The bottom line is that animals do not have any respect-based rights in the way that humans have, because we do not regard animals as having any moral value. They have only economic value. We value their interests economically, and we ignore their interests when it is economically beneficial for us to do so. At this point in time, it makes no sense to focus on the law, because as long as we regard animals as things, as a moral matter, the laws will necessarily reflect that absence of moral value and continue to do nothing to protect animals. We need to change social and moral thinking about animals before the law is going to do anything more.”

“I reject animal welfare reform and single-issue campaigns because they are not only inconsistent with the claims of justice that we should be making if we really believe that animal exploitation is wrong, but because these approaches cannot work as a practical matter. Animals are property and it costs money to protect their interests; therefore, the level of protection accorded to animal interests will always be low and animals will, under the best of circumstances, still be treated in ways that would constitute torture if applied to humans. By endorsing welfare reforms that supposedly make exploitation more “compassionate” or single-issue campaigns that falsely suggest that there is a coherent moral distinction between meat and dairy or between fur and wool or between steak and foie gras, we betray the principle of justice that says that all sentient beings are equal for purposes of not being used exclusively as human resources. And, on a practical level, we do nothing more than make people feel better about animal exploitation.”

“The rights paradigm, which, as I interpret it, morally requires the abolition of animal exploitation and requires veganism as a matter of fundamental justice, is radically different from the welfarist paradigm, which, in theory focuses on reducing suffering, and, in reality, focuses on tidying up animal exploitation at its economically inefficient edges. In science, those who subscribe to one paradigm are often unable to understand and engage those who subscribe to another paradigm precisely because the theoretical language that they use is not compatible. I think that the situation is similar in the context of the debate between animal rights and animal welfare. And that is why welfarists simply cannot understand or accept the slavery analogy.”

“The notion that we should promote “happy” or “humane” exploitation as “baby steps” ignores that welfare reforms do not result in providing significantly greater protection for animal interests; in fact, most of the time, animal welfare reforms do nothing more than make animal exploitation more economically productive by focusing on practices, such as gestation crates, the electrical stunning of chickens, or veal crates, that are economically inefficient in any event. Welfare reforms make animal exploitation more profitable by eliminating practices that are economically vulnerable. For the most part, those changes would happen anyway and in the absence of animal welfare campaigns precisely because they do rectify inefficiencies in the production process. And welfare reforms make the public more comfortable about animal exploitation. The “happy” meat/animal products movement is clear proof of that. We would never advocate for “humane” or "happy” human slavery, rape, genocide, etc. So, if we believe that animals matter morally and that they have an interest not only in not suffering but in continuing to exist, we should not be putting our time and energy into advocating for “humane” or “happy” animal exploitation.”

“If we take the position that an assessment that veganism is morally preferable to vegetarianism is not possible because we are all “on our own journey,” then moral assessment becomes completely impossible or is speciesist. It is impossible because if we are all “on our own journey,” then there is nothing to say to the racist, sexist, anti-semite, homophobe, etc. If we say that those forms of discrimination are morally bad, but, with respect to animals, we are all “on our own journey” and we cannot make moral assessments about, for instance, dairy consumption, then we are simply being speciesist and not applying the same moral analysis to nonhumans that we apply to the human context.”

“If we are ever going to see a paradigm shift, we have to be clear about how we want the present paradigm to shift. We must be clear that veganism is the unequivocal baseline of anything that deserves to be called an “animal rights” movement. If “animal rights” means anything, it means that we cannot morally justify any animal exploitation; we cannot justify creating animals as human resources, however “humane” that treatment may be. We must stop thinking that people will find veganism “daunting” and that we have to promote something less than veganism. If we explain the moral ideas and the arguments in favor of veganism clearly, people will understand. They may not all go vegan immediately; in fact, most won’t. But we should always be clear about the moral baseline. If someone wants to do less as an incremental matter, let that be her/his decision, and not something that we advise to do. The baseline should always be clear. We should never be promoting “happy” or “humane” exploitation as morally acceptable.”

“There are some animal advocates who say that to maintain that veganism is the moral baseline is objectionable because it is “judgmental,” or constitutes a judgment that veganism is morally preferable to vegetarianism and a condemnation that vegetarians (or other consumers of animal products) are “bad” people. Yes to the first part; no to the second. There is no coherent distinction between flesh and other animal products. They are all the same and we cannot justify consuming any of them. To say that you do not eat flesh but that you eat dairy or eggs or whatever, or that you don’t wear fur but you wear leather or wool, is like saying that you eat the meat from spotted cows but not from brown cows; it makers no sense whatsoever. The supposed “line” between meat and everything else is just a fantasy–an arbitrary distinction that is made to enable some exploitation to be segmented off and regarded as “better” or as morally acceptable. This is not a condemnation of vegetarians who are not vegans; it is, however, a plea to those people to recognize their actions do not conform with a moral principle that they claim to accept and that all animal products are the result of imposing suffering and death on sentient beings. It is not a matter of judging individuals; it is, however, a matter of judging practices and institutions. And that is a necessary component of ethical living.”

“An abolitionist is, as I have developed that notion, one who (1) maintains that we cannot justify animal use, however “humane” it may be; (2) rejects welfare campaigns that seek more “humane” exploitation, or single-issue campaigns that seek to portray one form of animal exploitation as morally worse than other forms of animal exploitation (e.g., a campaign that seeks to distinguish fur from wool or leather); and (3) regards veganism, or the complete rejection of the consumption or use of any animal products, as a moral baseline. An abolitionist regards creative, nonviolent vegan education as the primary form of activism, because she understands that the paradigm will not shift until we address demand and educate people to stop thinking of animals as things we eat, wear, or use as our resources.”

“In a daily life, reach out to others with sacred act of saying ‘hello, a smile, word of encouragement….”

Source: Think Great: Be Great!

“In carrying out a peacekeeping mission where the grand strategy is to maintain peace and order by persuading armed parties or other hostile elements to back away from aggressive activities, military strength is not a definite measure of success; neither could material contribution alone guarantees the "winning of the hearts and minds" of the people. What appears to be important is the day-to-day conduct of the peacekeepers on the ground; those who uphold the principles of neutrality and impartiality, as well as those who are able to carry all aspects of its operational duties exceptionally.”

Winning Leadership Victory Strategy Peace Making Peacekeeping

Author:Agus Harimurti Yudhoyono

“Killing a bunch of Jihadis may be morally justified, to save humanity from their wrath, but it won't terminate Jihad for long. Jihad or Holy war would keep festering one way or another, until religious fundamentalism is eradicated from the human society. Until the whole humanity learns to scrutinize its most revered scriptures with the sharp tool of reasoning, Jihad will keep on striking over the world. If one does not have the basic conscientious capacity to refute the primitive textual verses of the scriptures that demand one to kill or torture another being for holding a different belief system than one's own, then that entity is no being of the civilized human society, it is merely a pest from the stone-age. No Quran, no Bible, no Gita, no Cow, is greater than the human self. There shall be hope for harmony and peace in the world, only when fundamentalism is destroyed forever. Harmony is not a luxury, it is an existential necessity of the species. And to achieve it, if a hundred Bibles have to be sacrificed, then be it. But for no Bible, Quran or Gita, can harmony be compromised.”

“Das habe ich von meiner Großmutter gelernt: Daß man durch die Macht der Worte den Krieg nicht nur beginnen, sondern auch gewinnen kann.”

Inspirational Language Education Power Of Words Peace Making

Author:Diome Fatou

“There is no religion better than love, no color better than the color of happiness and no language better than the language of compassion.”