Quotessence
Home / Quotes / Quote by Ryan D Gebhart

Quote by Ryan D Gebhart

“Time is a funny thing, especially when you enter your heart; it’s as if it doesn’t exist there.”

Quote by Ryan D Gebhart

Create image

Author

Ryan D Gebhart

Browse famous quotes and profile details for Ryan D Gebhart. more

You May Also Like

“A kiss is the only thing you can throw at someone without being held criminally responsible.”

Love QuotesRelationship QuotesLove Quotes And SayingsLove QuoteMarriage QuotesLove QuotationsFunny QuotesHumorous QuotesDating QuotesHate QuotesCriminalLove Quotes And SayingLove Quotes For EverybodyRelationship Advice QuotesWife QuotesHusband QuotesAnger QuotesLove Quotes LoveRelationship Advice For WomenHumor QuotesHumor InspirationalBoyfriend And GirlfriendGirlfriend QuotesBoyfriend QuotesHumorous QuotationsRelationship Advice For MenCourtship QuotesWedding QuotesFight QuotesKiss QuotesFunny QuotationsHumor QuotationsAngry QuotesRelationship Advice QuoteSpouse Quotes
Author:Matshona Dhliwayo
Create image

“Marry your friend, and you will be reasonably happy. Marry your lover, and you will be abundantly happy. Marry your soulmate, and you will be infinitely happy.”

Life QuotesLove QuotesRelationship QuotesLife Quotes And SayingsLove Quotes And SayingsLife Lessons QuotesLife QuotationsHappiness QuotesLife Lesson QuotesLove QuoteLife QuoteMarriage QuotesLove QuotationsLife Quotes Inspirational QuotesLife Lessons QuotationsLove Quotes And SayingLove Quotes For EverybodyHappy QuotesFriend QuotesWife QuotesHappiness QuotationsHusband QuotesHappiness QuoteLove Quotes LoveRelationship Advice For WomenRelationship Advice For MenSoulmate QuotesRelationship 101Lover QuotesMarry QuotesRelationship Advice Quote
Author:Matshona Dhliwayo
Create image

“Another scenario is possible, and that is the e-book will succeed and that books will be downloaded from the Internet. But at the same time, it may be the case that the digital network and the terminals that tap into it will become saturated as limits to growth of computer memory and speed of operation are reached at the same time that electronic traffic becomes gridlocked with e-mail and World Wide Web use. If that were to happen, there would likely be pressure to keep older books in print form, and perhaps even continue to issue newer books that way, rather than clutter the Internet with more and more information. Under such a scenario, older books might not be allowed to circulate because so few copies of each title will have survived the great CD digital dispersal, leaving printed editions that will be as rare as manuscript codices are today. In spite of potential problems, the electronic book, which promises to be all books to all people, is seen by some visionaries as central to any scenario of the future. But what if some electromagnetic catastrophe or a mad computer hacker were to destroy the total electronic memory of central libraries? Curious old printed editions of dead books would have to be disinterred from book cemeteries and re-scanned. But in scanning rare works into electronic form, surviving books might have to be used in a library's stacks, the entrance to which might have to be as closely guarded as that to Fort Knox. The continuing evolution of the bookshelf would have to involve the wiring of bookstacks for computer terminal use. Since volumes might be electronically chained to their section in the stacks, it is also likely that libraries would have to install desks on the front of all cases so that portable computers and portable scanners could be used to transcribe books within a telephone wire's or computer cable's reach of where they were permanently kept. The aisles in a bookstack would most likely have to be altered also to provide seating before the desks, and in time at least some of the infrastructure associated with the information superhighway might begin again to resemble that of a medieval library located in the tower of a monastery at the top of a narrow mountain road.”

EbooksLibrary In The Digital Age
Author:Petroski, Henry
Create image

“There are many hypotheses in physics of almost comparable brilliance and elegance that have been rejected because they did not survive such a confrontation with experiment. In my view, the human condition would be greatly improved if such confrontations and willingness to reject hypotheses were a regular part of our social, political, economic, religious and cultural lives.”

ScienceHypothesis Testing
Book:The Dragons of Eden: Speculations on the Evolution of Human Intelligence
Create image

“I know of no significant advance in science that did not require major inputs from both cerebral hemispheres. This is not true for art, where apparently there are no experiments by which capable, dedicated and unbiased observers can determine to their mutual satisfaction which works are great.”

ArtScienceExperimentsHypothesis Testing
Book:The Dragons of Eden: Speculations on the Evolution of Human Intelligence
Create image

“We may still insist that space, although mainly emptiness, is completely “contaminated” by all the forces in the Universe—particles, waves, and so on. Still, based on this deduction or inference, we cannot prove that what is curved is space since nothing remains nothing and cannot be transformed into something based on the laws of physics. If the Nothing does not convert into something, the curvature of space is impossible. To prove the curvature of nothing (space), we must prove that nothing can transform itself into something based on the laws of physics. Suppose we further insist that this is only a problem of linguistics and philosophy and not physics since we stated that space is how we define it and not as it is. This reasoning would be insufficient because we must first prove that actual space is what it is and not what we say it is to fit our arguments. There can be no answers to the most critical questions of contemporary science, physics, philosophy, and even religions if we are not as precise as possible, linguistically, experimentally, or in any other way. These questions appear to be self-evident, self-explanatory truths and axioms, yet they are neither self-evident nor clear and precise to reflect the actual underlying reality. If we are not as precise as possible, we create theories and paradigms presented as facts, although the starting premises are undefined and unanswered. However, if we do not answer the starting causes and premises, we cannot adequately describe the laws of nature, nor can we understand them. Regardless of how sure we are about space and the curvature of space, we still cannot claim we are correct without describing the nature of nothing. Without the Nothing, there can be no space. There will be an immediate argument, though, that the Nothing has no nature and, therefore, there is nothing to describe. The answer is that its passivity and lack of properties are its most potent “property” because they enable creation and existence. Without the Nothing or void, there is no creation and no existence. We converted nothing into something by our thoughts and language, using deduction or inference, and concluded that space is the consequence of this thought process, not the actual process. We applied our definite language to our indefinite “understanding,” ideas, or reasoning to prove the “fact.” However, the fact is or is not, regardless of our ideas, language, or reasoning. We must use the opposite and apply language to the facts rather than our understanding. Our understanding is limited, and facts are impersonal and independent of our knowledge. We cannot falsify the language to fit and understand the facts better. We cannot change facts or affect them with our ideas, but facts are verifiable up to a point. There are facts beyond the verifiable point by humans since human beings are limited. Still, language is verifiable, and our theories are both falsifiable and verifiable to a large extent.”

TimeSpaceDejan StojanovicAbsoluteRelativityEinsteinCurvature Of Space
Book:ABSOLUTE
Create image