Quotessence
Home / Topics / Rhetoric Quotes

Rhetoric Quotes

Browse 641 quotes about Rhetoric.

Related topics

Rhetoric Quotes

“The wrong man is not always wrong because of his wrong actions, often he is wrong because of no actions.”

“A slip of the foot may injure your body, but a slip of the tongue will injure your bond.”

“The job of feets is walking, but their hobby is dancing.”

“Politeness is the first thing people lose once they get the power.”

“All worries are less with wine.”

“Father has a strengthening character like the sun and mother has a soothing temper like the moon.”

“Simplicity saves strength.”

“Be a worthy worker and work will come.”

“Common man's patience will bring him more happiness than common man's power.”

“Great losses are great lessons.”

“Take care of your costume and your confidence will take care of itself.”

“Health is hearty, health is harmony, health is happiness.”

“Networking isn't how many people you know, it's how many people know you.”

“Music shouldn't be just a tune, it should be a touch.”

“The smell of the sweat is not sweet, but the fruit of the sweat is very sweet.”

“A farmer is a magician who produces money from the mud.”

“War is not just the shower of bullets and bombs from both sides, it is also the shower of blood and bones on both sides.”

“During a conversation, listening is as powerful as loving.”

“The decision is your own voice, an opinion is the echo of someone else's voice.”

“Mixing old wine with new wine is stupidity, but mixing old wisdom with new wisdom is maturity.”

“If you can't impress them with your argument, impress them with your actions.”

“In the business people with expertise, experience and evidence will make more profitable decisions than people with instinct, intuition and imagination.”

“If thinking should precede acting, then acting must succeed thinking.”

“In your name, the family name is at last because it's the family name that lasts.”

“Rich can live better than poor but they cannot live without poor.”

“As a result of his experiments he concluded that imitation was a real evil that had to be broken before real rhetoric teaching could begin. This imitation seemed to be an external compulsion. Little children didn’t have it. It seemed to come later on, possibly as a result of school itself. That sounded right, and the more he thought about it the more right it sounded. Schools teach you to imitate. If you don’t imitate what the teacher wants you get a bad grade. Here, in college, it was more sophisticated, of course; you were supposed to imitate the teacher in such a way as to convince the teacher you were not imitating, but taking the essence of the instruction and going ahead with it on your own. That got you A’s. Originality on the other hand could get you anything – from A to F. The whole grading system cautioned against it.”

“Education makes your maths better, not necessarily your manners.”

“He who sacrifices his respect for love basically burns his body to obtain the light.”

“Seeing the mud around a lotus is pessimism, seeing a lotus in the mud is optimism.”

“Respect cannot be inherited, respect is the result of right actions.”

“Parents expect only two things from their children, obedience in their childhood and respect in their adulthood.”

“The problem arises when a society respects its scholars lesser and lesser and replaces intellectualism with anti-intellectualism. Such society forces the most intellectual members of its, toward alienation and instead develops populism and irrationalism and then calls it anti-elitism. On the other hand, scholars, due to being undermined by the society, find any effort hopeless and isolate themselves into their work. For a scholar, personally, nothing changes because the scholar always is a scholar no matter having someone to share the knowledge with or not, but the true problem forms in the most ordinary sections of the society, which eventually creates an opportunity for propaganda, conspiracy theories, rhetoric, and bogus.”

“In a democracy, there will be more complaints but less crisis, in a dictatorship more silence but much more suffering.”

“Critical thinking using root definitions is a skill set that allows an individual, by themselves, to judge and settle disputes as well as set limits on what is considered to be morally ethical and correct manners of someone who has one’s behavior in society. However, critical thinking is much more than its root definition. Critical thinking is skillfully defining, intellectualizing, analyzing, and evaluating data and information gathered from all sources and producing belief and action in rhetoric that provides clarity and consistency through evidence and reason.”

“One of the paradoxes about demagoguery is that it is simultaneously shameless and obsessed with honor. Shaming them about being internally inconsistent, incapable of reasonable defenses, citing sources that actually contradict what they say - that puts front and center the cognitive dissonance between their shamelessness and their obsession with honor. None of these strategies work with people who are deep into conspiracy theories, nor with bots, nor with people paid to argue, but, at least in a public forum, pointing out what is happening can get some other people to walk away from demagoguery. Notice that I'm not saying you will thereby persuade them they are wrong. After all, they might not be. You might be wrong. You might both be wrong. You might both be somewhat right. You're trying to persuade them to engage in deliberation, and that means you have to be willing to engage in it, too.”

“Good reasoning isn't primarily about being loud and confident and good on your feet. Those are skills worth developing⁠—as humans, we're built to respond to all of that⁠—but those aren't the things that make people good reasoners. The right-wing Logic Brigades give people the impression that caring about logic means dogmatically applying a few simple principles to everything and ignoring the fine-grained contextual differences between superficially similar situations. That's exactly wrong. If you actually care about getting the arguments right, you need to slow the hell down and pay attention to the subtleties.”

“And, substantially they hope to supplant the “disciplining of the higher faculty of the imagination” by what they call “education for democracy.” ... The very banality of the expression helps to ensure its triumph. Who could be against education? Who could be against democracy? Yet the phrase begs two questions: What do you mean by “education”? And what do you mean by “democracy”? The school of Dewey has long been fond of capturing words and turning them to their own purposes: they tried hard to capture “humanism”, and even laid siege to “religion” Now I am convinced that if, by “education,” the champions of this slogan mean merely recreation, socialization, and a kind of custodial jurisdiction over young people, then they are deliberately perverting a word with a reasonably distinct historical meaning and making it into what Mr. Richard Weaver, in his book, "Ethics of Rhetoric”, calls a "god-term"—that is, a charismatic expression drained dry of any objective significance, but remaining an empty symbol intended to win unthinking applause”

“Any girl with a grin never looks grim.”

“Some of us can live without a society but not without a family.”

“In united families, they might sleep with half filled stomach but no one sleeps with empty stomach.”